i don't see how they can bill him for anything anyway. unless they are claiming he "stole" the item.
he NEEDS to call and find out WTF is going on. Also you haven't given us much info. you know he needs to call so why ask us to agree?
Does the employee manual say that if you screw up at the register you are responsible? if not, keep throwing the bill in the trash.
l. BUT there's nothing to go on other than the bills and what he says happened.
However he is the type that does not care to hide anything. he tells us everything else we don't want to know oddly enough. lol.
But the bills are there, they did go up long after he was fired...why i don't know. for what none of us know. They more or less say the same thing. bill for a bottle and each time it went up. Lawyer fee's maybe? that's all i can think of.
In the US it is illegal to hold a regular employee acting in good faith financially responsible for damages or a company loss unless there is a contract in place stating such. He can be fired, but not charged for damages unless he was doing something illegal or agreed to pay restitution. Adding exorbitant fees or charges to any such restitution bill would be equally baseless unless your son signed a contract agreeing so such..
The only issues the company might have would be if they fired him for stealing, which they would have to prove, and they could only collect restitution for actual losses and maybe a tiny bit of interest over time. No court in the world would uphold an employer collecting restitution x100, but your son would have to respond to any law suit or they get the default judgment.
You stepson needs to figure out exactly who's billing him and why. Is this some dirt-bag collection agency? Sounds like we all have only half of the story here.
Also, because he is an adult, his former employer is legally prohibited from discussing anything relating to his employment with you. You son will have to handle this himself.
Every time you respond to a troll, God kills a kitten.
In the US it is illegal to hold a regular employee acting in good faith financially responsible for damages or a company loss unless there is a contract in place stating such. He can be fired, but not charged for damages unless he was doing something illegal or agreed to pay restitution. Adding exorbitant fees or charges to any such restitution bill would be equally baseless unless your son signed a contract agreeing so such..
The only issues the company might have would be if they fired him for stealing, which they would have to prove, and they could only collect restitution for actual losses and maybe a tiny bit of interest over time. No court in the world would uphold an employer collecting restitution x100, but your son would have to respond to any law suit or they get the default judgment.
You stepson needs to figure out exactly who's billing him and why. Is this some dirt-bag collection agency? Sounds like we all have only half of the story here.
Also, because he is an adult, his former employer is legally prohibited from discussing anything relating to his employment with you. You son will have to handle this himself.
what was obvious is the fact i mentioned he has NO MONEY. NO JOB EQUALS NO MONEY.
So that's $820.00 for a half empty bottle. I can understand why anyone would not want to pay them after getting fired, $820.00 for a half bottle worth no more than $5 that they made half their money off of on his sale to begin with.
I never said he does not pay his bills. Actually he does when he has money, but it takes money to pay bills. That does not make him a loser, he tries but ATM he thinks this is stupid and he is ignoring it since he can't pay.
So lets recap for those who can't read. DG made half of their asking price for half bottle of something they really coulndt otherwise sell. So them asking him for half is reasonable. Asking for a total of $820.00 after like 4 months i think is not so reasonable. I told him he needs to call, but you know, he's going to have that attitude then he's going to have to lay in the bed he makes. I'm not defending his actions, but the other comments are getting stupid. Obviously paying them $820.00 would make it go away, maybe.
i still think DG's being dicks about it. half the bottle price is a no brainer, even full bottle price is a no brainer but DG's first bill was way more than cost of bottle and now its silly prices.
Frankly i don't give a crap how he deals this, just gathering reasonable input. But its not unreasonable to see how someone would not want to pay their asking price....now if they didn't fire him, then i can see some fee's being reasonable in order to kee his job but their getting a bit extreme and they can do what they want.
