what should be done when the divided house of saud strikes again?

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
i believe that the only solution, the only way to keep liberty is to disband the union (as of which has always been involuntary) while confederalizing its assets whenever the house of saud strikes again... the islamists wont be able to murder non-islamists in America if the former doesnt have a central target.

to be clear, all independent men, those descended from the American Secessionists and particularly the Secessionists from the former CSA especially louisiana, alabama, mississippi, georgia, and the carolinas can "stand their ground" and when it is their own land and friends that are at risk and they have the homefield advantage then they will defend liberty successfully. unfortunately, there is a very real and scary possibility that disbandment of the union and confederalization will not happen because the next terrorist attacks in america will be the excuse (not a reason, but an excuse... centralization of power is never rational because executives are always dependent on their subjects) to officially end all federalism.

so the only conspiracy is the American State's inability to defend its subjects (so i am back to my original position on that thanks to walter b jones... helped me realize that just because some parts of the official account were false or perhaps not verifiable does not mean it was done deliberately by the Dick or the Bush).

as for next week, i will talk about how enough is never enough for central banksters, psychiatrists, and other corporatist keynesians (including the super-dependent pharmaceutical sector) and marxists, how they are corrupt, how the fed chair always has the ability to have as many USD denominated paper assets than all other subjects combined, and nicholas biddle's attempt at murdering the Old Republic (and how the cute sweet Little Magician preserved the union as it should have been and how it should be, i.e., voluntary).

finally, i want everyone to know that i do not like myself and that i fear myself. i hate myself because i am phonier than al gore... i dont have a bone of emotion in my entire body although al gore may have a few small ones even when he got up and said "i introduce you to Bill Clinton the greatest president ever!"... but the point is that i was not born a Bibi cock-sucking, self-sacrificing, father fucker like willard mittens ("mitt") bob dole romney/george bob herbert walker dole was and for that i want to die.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
large.gif
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
The mods should really ban you. Maybe, that would force you to get some help.
why do you worry about me getting some "help" so much? are you a national security statist or something? why do you think i am such a threat to society? have you noticed me threatening anyone here with violence? just wondering, not trying to be rude:)

most people here ignore me and those who replied in this thread up to now did a good job derailing it anyway.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
Naaaah - He needs his own radio show.
talk show hosts are not free and they are way too corruptible due to the State... Rush Limbaugh and Hannity are corruptible as hell and bill o'reilly is dishonest.

michael savage is good even though i disagree with his nationalism but i am not his intellectual caliber and that makes me worry that i would be more like limbaugh or one of the guys on fox (other than the ever incorruptible dennis kucinich). i am just not incorruptible especially with legal tender or even the threat of legal tender... i worry that i would attempt to silence all opposition and protect my own business like washington's rude ass did with the Whiskey Rebellion (his distillery benefited from the whiskey tax at the expense of the poor productive frontier folk like the calvinistic scots-irish descended anti-centralists who made up the bulk of the only democracy america ever had) and i am nothing like the incorruptible, nice ones who make do make money (like katie couric and maddow) but then they have an IQ at least two and half times my own and advanced interpersonal skills... i used to not be really fond of katie couric and maddow because i thought they were just too modernly liberal, but i have come to see what a nice, creative, good person they are over the past year or so. then katie gets props from me for taking the risk of allowing an honest debate on vaccines while rachel expressed her position better than Rand Paul did (even though i agree more with rand paul's position, he just isnt a guy who intuits outside the box nor is he super polite like his father).

and then i am no master of deception like ariana huffington is... she must have been obama's prime mentor. i wish i had been born to a mother who could manipulate people like that rather being one who is easily manipulated.
 
Last edited:

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
Wow, all this time I thought he was really Ed Schultz.
your buddy mark levin is contributing to the destruction of liberty with that article v shit, calling secessionists and nullifiers "leftists", and thinking the State could ever actually follow the Constitution... that dude is an even angrier loser than i am.
and only 1% of people who would ever even run for public office could restrain themselves yet mark levin fails to realize that... maybe because he dislikes Dr. Paul so much yet Dr. Paul is 99% different from all other presidents except martin van buren.

as for mark schultz... i actually used to be a far leftist (with some zionist elements, and pro-humanitarian war elements) but then i realized the State is "rude, mean, and disrespectful" more so than i will ever be so i became an anarcho-secessionist. so in other words, i am not really mark schultz (he supported the right wing State, now he supports the left wing State), and you have no more "paradigms for change" than i do if i am not wrong.
 
Last edited:

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,330
12,840
136
finally, i want everyone to know that i do not like myself and that i fear myself. i hate myself because i am phonier than al gore... i dont have a bone of emotion in my entire body although al gore may have a few small ones even when he got up and said "i introduce you to Bill Clinton the greatest president ever!"... but the point is that i was not born a Bibi cock-sucking, self-sacrificing, father fucker like willard mittens ("mitt") bob dole romney/george bob herbert walker dole was and for that i want to die.
seriously, you need better meds. the ones you are currently taking (if any) are not working.

perhaps a new doctor might help.
 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,330
12,840
136
why do you worry about me getting some "help" so much? are you a national security statist or something? why do you think i am such a threat to society? have you noticed me threatening anyone here with violence? just wondering, not trying to be rude:)

most people here ignore me and those who replied in this thread up to now did a good job derailing it anyway.
you missed the point.

you are not a threat to anyone but yourself. people may criticize you but they hope you will get treatment for what is an obvious mental issue.

Also: any thread you make is derailed before anyone hits reply.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
seriously, you need better meds. the ones you are currently taking (if any) are not working.
considering how pisspoor most medications i have tried are i am pretty happy with what i am on now. :) if i were to take an anti-convulsant chemical then i miss out on thoughts and the success rate for them is not high anyway. SSRIs have too many side effects and even if they didn't the dosage has to be rigidly constant or else i get really angry and want punch holes in the wall (for starters)... i could go on.

and i am going to get alternative supplmental treatment soon.
perhaps a new doctor might help.
i am switching to a primary care physician for all of my prescriptions when i move because the psychiatrists only care about making money, they act like they know about my body and my thoughts better than i do (they dont even think we are equal, they are better than the world in their evil minds), they want to see me when i need the prescriptions which means they are using me to make money off of me... out of all professionals, psychiatrists are among the most dependent leeches.

to be clear... all psychiatrists are nearly identical to all psychiatrists, trust me on that one. career psychiatrists are all pretty mediocre in intelligence (probably only 95th percentile yet they act like they're the very best), they know nothing about anything other than psychiatry (and they cant know all of it on top of that), none are cash only (they depend on insurance for a living) , all take medicare or medicaid if not both, they get so many benefits from the pharmaceutical industry which has become dependent and will not be independent if the market were allowed to reduce it to its natural size, i could go on.

all medicine should be over the counter as long as the NAP is not violated (e.g., sellers of medicine should be allowed to charge whatever they want to if anything without being threatened with violence), everyone should be free to defend themselves unless they have killed or raped someone, the insanity defense should be dropped, justice should be radically confederalized and totally out of the hands of any hierarchical power, etc., etc., i could go on. anyone with any sense can put it all together so i am not going to go on.:)
Also: any thread you make is derailed before anyone hits reply.
i simply asked a very clear question and requested a discussion. i received replies mostly from trolls and, as expected, from the AT forums stalker-in-chief (i.e., Capt. Caveman). thank you for caring:)
 
Last edited:

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,168
34,496
136
Your original post basically says that under the threat of continued violence on the part of the House of Saud, America should dissolve. Maybe exterminating the Saudi thugs might be a more reasonable approach.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
Your original post basically says that under the threat of continued violence on the part of the House of Saud, America should dissolve. Maybe exterminating the Saudi thugs might be a more reasonable approach.
thank you:) and that is 100% true, but the two are not mutually exclusive given how incompetent the State has been lately.

heads of State dont go after other heads of State rather than causing all kinds of war is because war is the health of the State. some give excuse that having an anti-assassination policy was because it would cause disorder, but it will be a lot less disorderly for america and the rest of the world to just find out who all the pro-al qaida people in the house of saud are and then take them out one by one.

but least disorderly for everyone other than the terrorists would be to leave it up to independent democratic govts to take terrorists out.

today's troops go into the military either for revenge against innocent brown people, to make them feel more manly, or as career but that has caused taxation to sky rocket, has isolated americans from the rest of the world, will isolate us even more in the future, and caused deaths of innocents at home and abroad, as well as most of the american troops because they either get killed abroad or come home with PTSD, injuries, jobless, confused, and/or divorced.