Victorian Gray
Lifer
- Nov 25, 2013
- 32,083
- 11,718
- 136
No, it's not.
-John
It's $2500 in India. And here is why, it's due to government /legal action.
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...70-000-in-the-us-costs-2-500-in-india/274847/
No, it's not.
-John
That's like saying that Tobacco is cheap in North Carolina. It's only cheap in North Carolina because the Governments in the other states are taxing it 3x to 300x.It's $2500 in India. And here is why, it's due to government /legal action.
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...70-000-in-the-us-costs-2-500-in-india/274847/
Use the Sherman Anti-Trust act to reverse the purchase of some of the smaller drug companies that produced generic drugs by the larger pharmaceuticals...
that or accept the fact that if you can't afford increased drug prices then you obviously don't make enough to matter to the people who make decisions about drug prices.
...
From reading the various articles the issue is not that prescription drug prices are rising as a whole - its that the brand new drug costs are going up. Looking at the articles it seems the new ones are driving the average price up while the mean is falling.
One of my wife's asthma drugs has nearly tripled in price since it was released in 2004. At the current spot price, the drug sells for 14,000 times as much as gold per once. Thanks to the corrupt U.S. patent system, the drug was evergreened, delaying any possibility of a generic alternative for an additional ten years.
The problem is those laws are difficult to enforce when actions involve extra-national corporations. Further, it's a lot more complicated that that. In order to make most anything you need a source of raw materials. What has been happening with increasing frequency is that non-pharmaceutical entities are taking advantage of this fact. Here's a real world example. Tetracycline related drugs are cheap to make. Well they were, until the key ingredient needed to produce them was taken over and then stopped. That drove the remaining value of stockpiles ever higher and eventually these effective and inexpensive medications could not be had anywhere in the world.
At that point production resumes, but the price of that vital ingredient skyrockets, to the point that something which might cost 5 cents to make increases by almost a hundred times. You don't just "make stuff" to replace what you are being robbed for as costs are very high for tooling and refining for pharmaceutical grade ingredients.
So the "robber drug companies" are selling a ten dollar bottle of pills for $500 and of course that's because they are evil and gouging. Well, not in this an many other cases, so it's probably a good idea to not subscribe to the dogma of popular evil in absence of facts.
LOL
Ridiculous.
-John
Dems bitched and moaned about Medicare Part D for years and years. I thought it was interesting that costs came in much, much lower than their apocalyptic projections.Bush already took care of rising drug costs years ago with Medicare Part D. I can only conjecture it was a resounding success as it didn't take any criticism like Obamacare did.
I'm a huge fan of banning direct to consumer advertising (DTCA).
They should ban all Alcohol, Tobacco and these Pharmaceutical ads. Why as a consumer do I need to know about new products from these people? I would never understand the chemistry involved in them anyway. The doctor should be the one recommending new drugs to put their patients on and not the patients recommending new drugs to their doctor to prescribe them.
LOL, so alcohol and tobacco should be included now as well, just because you don't use them?
I don't use tampons, and demand those ads be taken off the air!!! They're offensive to me as a man, because I have womb envy!!! Society needs to adjust to me and my sensitive feelings!!!
LOL, "liberals"...
Drug companies spend more on advertising than they do on R and D. Why do they need to do television ads aimed at consumers?
LOL, right winger apologists for gouging.
ccording to a study by Pembroke Consulting posted on Drugchannels.net the increases are staggering. For example, from July 2013 to July 2014 Captopril 50 mg tablets went from a National Average Drug Acquisition Cost ("NADC") by pharmacies of 3 cents a tablet to $1.31 a tablet. That's an increase of 3,806%. Captropril is taken by millions of people to control blood pressure. It is a very old, safe drug. There is no shortage or other reason to explain the increase. During the same time period the NADAC cost for the antibiotic tetracycline 500 mg capsule increased a whopping 17,714%. Tetracycline is another very old drug. It's not some cutting-edge treatment that a company recently spent millions to create.