what r the defference between MX & Titanum Product from nVidia ....

[Hossam]

Hello,

what r the defferrence between MX & Titanum Product from nVidia .... ?

 

[cdub]

In the GeForce4 line of cards, the MX cards are basically slightly-improved GeForce2 cards, with none of the true technical enhancements of the GeForce3 or GeForce4 lines of cards. Whereas the Titanium cards are the real deal, they are the current, state-of-the-art nVidia chipsets with all the current enhancements.

I think the the GeForce2 line, the MX cards had SDR memory whereas the normal Ti cards had DDR memory. I could be wrong about that though.

The moral of this story: NEVER buy a GF4MX card. It's a waste of money. Buy a GF3 or GF4Ti4200 instead.

 

[AndyHui]

Ti = Faster, more expensive.
MX = Cheaper, slower.

 

[AnAndAustin]

As pretty much summed up, it depends upon what generation you're talking.

GF4TI are enahnced GF3 cards and superior in every way.
GF4MX are enhanced GF2 cards, still inferior in most ways (certainly speed) to GF3 cards.
GF3TI cards came in both TI200 (slower) and TI500 (slightly faster) forms but were essentially identical to the standard GF3.
GF3MX never surfaced, many thought this would have been a more apt but still shameful name for the GF4MX cards.
GF2TI are slightly faster than GF2GTS but slightly slower than GF2Ultra, but are significantly cheaper than GF2Ultra.
GF2MX have half the RAM throughput (SDR) of the equivilent GF2GTS/Pro/TI/Ultra (All DDR) which knocks perf at least 50%.

HTH!

EDIT: See how these cards line up; TomsHW VGA Chart (Many cards)