what percentage of restaurants do the 'ol bait and switch

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,764
6,645
126
I could read it with AdBlock turned on.

And LOL @ giving a $30 gift card as restitution. Yeah, because I'm sure the people who got screwed are dying to go back to the restaurant, to use the $30 gift card.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken g6

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
the entire article shows up for me, even blocking latimes.com

i run ublock origin

33tnvjs.jpg
 

Matthiasa

Diamond Member
May 4, 2009
5,755
23
81
To be honest if the person couldn't tell does it really matter? Pay for something you think tastes good not just because it has some easily substituted ingredient that you view as somehow better because its more expensive. They are complaining about receiving one mostly tasteless fish instead of another mostly tasteless fish.

Now if eating a whole fish rather than fillets it might be different but as stated they couldn't tell so that wasn't what was happening
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,918
11,251
126
To be honest if the person couldn't tell does it really matter? Pay for something you think tastes good not just because it has some easily substituted ingredient that you view as somehow better because its more expensive. They are complaining about receiving one mostly tasteless fish instead of another mostly tasteless fish.

Now if eating a whole fish rather than fillets it might be different but as stated they couldn't tell so that wasn't what was happening
Not sure about sole, but a lot of tilapia comes from China. Flavor/texture aside, that's a good reason to avoid it.
 

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,376
454
126
I think people pay the high price for wild caught fish. They have higher levels of omega 3's. And they aren't fed literal pig and chicken shit or given steroids as they are on asian farms.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
I think people pay the high price for wild caught fish. They have higher levels of omega 3's. And they aren't fed literal pig and chicken shit or given steroids as they are on asian farms.

Lot of the omega 3 is on the skin. Filets are usually served without the skin and covered in sauce.

But fish bait and switch doesn't surprise me. It happens all the time with seafood. I see it with Stone crab and Jonah crab and others.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
To be honest if the person couldn't tell does it really matter? Pay for something you think tastes good not just because it has some easily substituted ingredient that you view as somehow better because its more expensive. They are complaining about receiving one mostly tasteless fish instead of another mostly tasteless fish.

Now if eating a whole fish rather than fillets it might be different but as stated they couldn't tell so that wasn't what was happening

Seafood specific allergies are real and in many cases with seafood allergies they are extreme to the point of being fatal. So yes, some people can eat certain seafood, but not other seafood without literally dying. Personally if I had any seafood allergy I would avoid it all, but not everyone does. They rely on what they order to be served as they ordered it.
 

Matthiasa

Diamond Member
May 4, 2009
5,755
23
81
If they had a fish allergy it would be caused with both of the listed fish... While fish and shellfish get grouped as seafood they are biologically different. Even shellfish gets broken down into crustaceans and mollusks although joint allergies for those are common.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
If they had a fish allergy it would be caused with both of the listed fish... While fish and shellfish get grouped as seafood they are biologically different. Even shellfish gets broken down into crustaceans and mollusks although joint allergies for those are common.

Some people can be allergic to just Tuna for example or Tuna like fish, but can eat other types of fish with no problems. The common allergies are not usually that specific, but specific allergies for various seafood fauna do exist.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
And within the first 2 minutes it's bullshit. Restaurants aren't legally allowed to pay less than minimum wage. If, after tips, you make less than minimum wage, they are legally required to pay you the difference.


If all the employees are making tips that put them at min wage or higher, then the restaurant is legally paying less than minimum wage. So his statement is correct. It is just making the customers pay the wage instead of the restaurant in the first place. That was the point he was trying to get across. He didn't go into every little nit picking point because that wouldn't make a good show. So pointing out that if the employee with tips doesn't make minimum wage, which doesn't happen often, that the restaurant is still liable for making the difference wouldn't make a show.

Side note: The times I know where that happens, from my past working that business, is if an employee has to force a restaurant to make up the difference to meet min wage requirements, chances are that employee is going to be looking for work soon. The restaurant can use that an excuse for poor performance and fire the person.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
Bait and switch on seafood, at least 90%. Suckers can't tell the difference. And it's not just restaurants, supermarkets and fish markets will do the same thing. If you think you're buying filets or steaks of an expensive fish like Chilean Sea Bass you're almost certainly getting some other cheaper similar fish that they pass off as the more desirable species.
 
Last edited: