Originally posted by: BoberFett
28% is the standard
Originally posted by: BoberFett
28% is the standard
Yes, there is a standard. When attempting to get a mortgage lenders use 28/36 for conventional loans or 29/41 for an FHA loan.Originally posted by: Amplifier
Originally posted by: BoberFett
28% is the standard
There is no standard. Income, goals, needs all play a huge roll in how he should balance his housing budget.
Again, give me some more information (unless you want cliche advice)
That's probably about right then, you don't want to go any higher than that.Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: BoberFett
28% is the standard
Well the house I am looking at would be 27% of my gf and I's income.
Originally posted by: Brian23
Most people will say 40%. I say as much as possible. The less time you're paying interest, the more money you'll have later to buy awesome stuff.
Originally posted by: Amplifier
Depends on what your goals/situations are. Could you give me more information so I can give you informed advice? I'll be back from court at ~noon.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
That's probably about right then, you don't want to go any higher than that.
Those numbers represent the standard percentages that lenders use to determine how much debt you can handle. The first number is your housing costs. They generally won't lend you more than that percentage of your gross income to pay towards housing. The second number is your total long term debt percentage. Long term debt includes the minimum monthly payment on all credit cards, auto and school loans with more than ten months of payments left, etc. All long term debt together will generally have to be below that second percentage.Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: BoberFett
That's probably about right then, you don't want to go any higher than that.
I've heard of the mmortgage people uisng the ratios you mentioned above. Can you excplain them a little?
When they figure the monthly payment and house you can afford do they calculate taxes and insurance into it? Also, what is the difference between an FHA and regular mortgage? Aren't FHA ones capped at $177k or so?
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Mortgage lenders will lend more than that. Hell, I was approved for a loan that equaled out to be 50% of out income. Needless to say we didn't spend near that, but lenders will pretty much approve anything.
This is with student and auto loans.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Mortgage lenders will lend more than that. Hell, I was approved for a loan that equaled out to be 50% of out income. Needless to say we didn't spend near that, but lenders will pretty much approve anything.
This is with student and auto loans.
What lender? Traditional bank or fly-by-night internet lender? What type of loan program?
As a realtor I hear of more deals going sour because of these damn internet lenders. A lot of people I talk to are starting to advise their sellers to require buyers that are using internet lenders to get approved by another lender of their choosing. They can still get the loan from their original lender, but the seller needs to make sure that the financing will actually make it through underwriting and one way to do that is to get a second opinion from a reputable lender.
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Mortgage lenders will lend more than that. Hell, I was approved for a loan that equaled out to be 50% of out income. Needless to say we didn't spend near that, but lenders will pretty much approve anything.
This is with student and auto loans.
What lender? Traditional bank or fly-by-night internet lender? What type of loan program?
As a realtor I hear of more deals going sour because of these damn internet lenders. A lot of people I talk to are starting to advise their sellers to require buyers that are using internet lenders to get approved by another lender of their choosing. They can still get the loan from their original lender, but the seller needs to make sure that the financing will actually make it through underwriting and one way to do that is to get a second opinion from a reputable lender.
It wasn't a bank nor was it an internet lender. It was a small mortgage broker. We didn't stick with him, though. We went with Chase, instead.
Originally posted by: Brian23
Most people will say 40%. I say as much as possible. The less time you're paying interest, the more money you'll have later to buy awesome stuff.
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Brian23
Most people will say 40%. I say as much as possible. The less time you're paying interest, the more money you'll have later to buy awesome stuff.
Unless you put that extra money into an investment with larger returns than the interest rate on your mortgage. Then you'll have more money later for that awesome stuff
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Those numbers represent the standard percentages that lenders use to determine how much debt you can handle. The first number is your housing costs. They generally won't lend you more than that percentage of your gross income to pay towards housing. The second number is your total long term debt percentage. Long term debt includes the minimum monthly payment on all credit cards, auto and school loans with more than ten months of payments left, etc. All long term debt together will generally have to be below that second percentage.
If a person has no long term debt, no credit card balance and no car payments, they will probably be able to borrow the max housing percentage based on income. However a person with school loans, credit cards and a car payment that already total 15% of their monthly income, you have to subtract that 15 from the second number. So in the case of conventional, that leaves you with 21% and FHA 26%.
In other words once your long term debt gets over 8% for conventional or 12% for FHA, it begins to affect your ability to borrow the maximum amount for a home loan.
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Brian23
Most people will say 40%. I say as much as possible. The less time you're paying interest, the more money you'll have later to buy awesome stuff.
Unless you put that extra money into an investment with larger returns than the interest rate on your mortgage. Then you'll have more money later for that awesome stuff
Can you guarantee those rates of return vs the guaranteed rate of your mortgage?
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Our student loans are $70k, her car is around $23, and her CC debt and appliance/furniture are about $14k. That's $107k. 🙁 At least most of it is from student loans that allowed us to get good jobs. I'd like to pay off the CCs and her car as soon as possible, but am not too worried about the school loans.
So if I know our gross monthly income is X, and our monthly debt payments are Y... how do I calculate those two ratios?
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Brian23
Most people will say 40%. I say as much as possible. The less time you're paying interest, the more money you'll have later to buy awesome stuff.
Unless you put that extra money into an investment with larger returns than the interest rate on your mortgage. Then you'll have more money later for that awesome stuff
Can you guarantee those rates of return vs the guaranteed rate of your mortgage?
If someone wants to pay 40% of their income towards their mortgage, I say go right ahead, as long as their actual payment is about 2/3 of that amount. Putting extra money towards your mortgage is excellent, I recommend it to anyone. Compare a 20 yr mortgage to a 30yr and look at how much money is saved over the lifetime of the loan. And paying back a 30 yr amortization in 20 yrs is even better.