Fixed that for you.all of the x86 cpu industry is either intel or amd.
All I can think of is the Via Epia embedded stuff (C3, etc), which last time I looked were a lot worse than Intel's Atom chips (perf, perf-per-watt and overall chipset driver quality). Nothing like the old days of the 486 clones (Cyrix, IBM, SGS Thompson, UMC, etc). These days, enthusiasts usually muck about with ARM / Raspberry Pi stuff, or for x86, those tiny Mini-ITX / NUC's.most of the enthusiast cpu industry is either intel or amd. what else is there?
most of the enthusiast cpu industry is either intel or amd.
what else is there?
assuming you would have to use some sort of linux?
would many linux games and software still be compatible?
anything else?
Else there is also plenty of alternatives outside of x86.
which ones?
Or tinkering. The RPi isn't the only cheap ARM dev board out there, anymore.There's ARM if you're enthusiastic about Angry Birds.
Fixed that for you.
Take a time machine two decades back, and you'll find other manufacturers like Cyrix or VIA. But it's a 2-player market (that may even shrink down to just one years down the line) because CPUs are hard.
If you don't mind obsolete software you can dig up old Alpha/Itanium/MIPS/SPARC workstations on eBay.
I'm running an Alpha CPU built on a 5nm process, puny humans.
ARM could be a fun diversion. Get something with a fairly standard variant of the instruction set, like the Beaglebone Black- the Raspberry Pi has some weird quirks relating to its floating point unit, and is based on an older version of the instruction set.