What monitor are you using to edit photos?

thestrangebrew1

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2011
3,953
687
126
I posted in the display section but didn't get any replies. My 24" acer monitor bit the dust and now I'm looking for a replacement. I figured since I got into photography lately, maybe I should look into an entry level monitor good for photo editing. I'm looking for a 27" minimum, but I'm unsure if 1440p is good to go with or if I should just spring for 4k. I'm not even sure my rig can handle 4k at this time. I'll do some light gaming on it, mostly minecraft playing with my daughter, *maybe* I'll get back into the BF series but I don't really have time for games anymore.

At any rate, my specs:

i7 2700k (non OC'd)
16gb RAM
670 gtx
Asrock mobo (z68 I think)

I was looking at the Dell p2715q but it's a bit over budget on Dell's website. Any thoughts on this or another budget monitor?
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,838
6,925
136
If you doesn't print your photos it is not that important, since they will look different on all monitors.
 

Mike64

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2011
2,108
101
91
As biostud alludes to, it mostly depends on what you're editing photos for, and then secondly, what resolution (photos) you're talking about. But fundamentally more important than monitor resolution is its color space and gamut, and relative accuracy/stability. (That's especially true for editing photos to be printed anywhere that does a better job than your local chain drugstore, but even if people will be looking at them on different monitors, it can be helpful to you to know exactly what your own baseline is when you're editing, and for tweaking them for other devices with some semblance of accuracy and control.) Here's an article that looks like a reasonable overview of the issues involved, though I just grabbed it from the top of a list of search hits and barely skimmed it. There may well be/probably are better general articles on the subject.

Frankly, if you're "just getting into it", I'd advise not buying a monitor specifically with photo editing in mind unless you can/will use it as a secondary monitor. If you end up basically just dicking around with your photos (and really, there's nothing wrong with that) and especially if you won't be printing a majority of them, it won't matter much what monitor you use as long as it has reasonable color reproduction and good contrast. And if you do end up really staying "into it", there'll be time enough to spend big bucks on a good IPS monitor that will, conversely, basically suck for gaming or watching videos with any amount of "action", since they tend to be slow and have high input lag.

PS: 4K resolution would really be pointless for photo editing, especially beginner hobbyist level editing, unless you're planning to do extremely detailed, micro-level edits, or the photos would mostly be viewed on high resolution monitors and so you'd want to better see exactly what your audience will be seeing when they view them. Especially since you'd probably have to take out a second mortgage to buy a 4K monitor with good specs for the more important features, if such monitors even exist... (And I assume they must if you're willing to spend enough money, but they're far beyond anything I ever pay attention to...)

And last but by no means least, keep in mind that even a "good" IPS monitor is kinda useless without being calibrated, and re-calibrated with some regularity. So unless you're wiling to spend the money on the hardware/software to do that, that's another reason to hold off until you really start feeling held back by the capabilities of whatever monitor you use to start with.
 
Last edited: