This is not considured a math theorem, even though it is always true, and can be proven as such.
Let X = {x1,x2,x3,...,xn}
let fX|Theta be a pdf of X|Theta
for all Theta-hat such that E(Theta-hat) = Theta
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/8/6/4863a647daf34f1e0b8a05c316c03a05.png
This a theorem in Statistics, but why isn't it considured a theorem when it comes to pure math.
What makes this Stats and maybe applied math, rather than pure math?
Let X = {x1,x2,x3,...,xn}
let fX|Theta be a pdf of X|Theta
for all Theta-hat such that E(Theta-hat) = Theta
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/8/6/4863a647daf34f1e0b8a05c316c03a05.png
This a theorem in Statistics, but why isn't it considured a theorem when it comes to pure math.
What makes this Stats and maybe applied math, rather than pure math?
