Its lala fantasy land bs. Without the "grand compromise" these states wouldn't be united.
"Would not have been united at the time".
The Civil War settled the rest of it.
Its lala fantasy land bs. Without the "grand compromise" these states wouldn't be united.
Is there some factual error in what he offered?
I don't believe he said "terrible", either- he merely stated the facts, for the most part.
Oh, wait, I forgot. You have a problem with facts. They're sooo inconvenient for you.
he didn't state facts he was crying about how congress is organized. how far up his ass are you?
To quote someone else that quoted my wife breaking her phone on the second day of owning it.So you think its the Republicans in the Senate blocking the bills passed by the Republicans in the HoR?![]()
"Would not have been united at the time".
The Civil War settled the rest of it.

The house has passed 14 bills to reform the VA in the wake of all the VA bull shit yet they all sit on Harry Reid's desk. T!
he didn't state facts he was crying about how congress is organized. how far up his ass are you?
So you think somehow there would've been a Civil War even if the union never happened?![]()
Well the right media has twisted it again.
Did some research and you are off its actually 6 bills that the senate has not taken up and one that the house just passed. I didn't look at the all the bills themselves but scan through them there are a log of other bills tied to these bills. They really need to stop doing that and vote on each bill.
Never offered that. They just might not have become the United States in 1789. As has been offered, the composition of the Senate was part of the deal.
Don't apply conspiracy theory thinking to what I offer- just read it, OK?
I try to be straightforward, say what I mean.
I did read it. If there wasn't any sort of deeper implied meaning to your post then it's just off topic garbage.
Fact: the grand compromise in the Senate and HOR was central in the formation of the Union.
Fact: the smaller states were not going to sign on without what they felt was their fair share of representation.
Conclusion: without the grand compromise, there is no union of states to have a war over.
What's wrong with the Senate and in general U.S. politics is that the general public is uninformed. More often than not people cannot described the 3 Branches of Government.
It leads to too many bad choices by voters with usually is less than 50% of the general population exercising that right and duty.
....
I's say the scarier part is many do who don't know how it works, myself, also, apparently.afaik, people who don't have any idea how government works generally don't vote.
What's wrong with the Senate and in general U.S. politics is that the general public is uninformed. More often than not people cannot described the 3 Branches of Government.
It leads to too many bad choices by voters with usually is less than 50% of the general population exercising that right and duty.
....
Its lala fantasy land bs. Without the "grand compromise" these states wouldn't be united.
"Would not have been united at the time".
The Civil War settled the rest of it.
So you think somehow there would've been a Civil War even if the union never happened?![]()
Never offered that. They just might not have become the United States in 1789. As has been offered, the composition of the Senate was part of the deal.
Don't apply conspiracy theory thinking to what I offer- just read it, OK?
I try to be straightforward, say what I mean.
I did read it. If there wasn't any sort of deeper implied meaning to your post then it's just off topic garbage.
Fact: the grand compromise in the Senate and HOR was central in the formation of the Union.
Fact: the smaller states were not going to sign on without what they felt was their fair share of representation.
Conclusion: without the grand compromise, there is no union of states to have a war over.
It was in direct response to your post, entirely relevant to it. If it's OT, blame yourself for being there.
The house has passed 14 bills to reform the VA in the wake of all the VA bull shit yet they all sit on Harry Reid's desk. This truly is the jackass party and it goes to show you that they really don't give a shit about our veterans. I for one hope they all loss their asses in November. Fuck you grabasstic assholes!
Who's to privatizing the VA? The feds have shown time and time again they can't run shit!
The issue no one ever seems to want to acknowledge is that when a bill is passed from one of the houses with one of the things everyone can agree on, it tends to have all kinds of goodies attached for one party and nothing but cuts for the other. Then when the other party votes against it because of all the add ons their opponents get "outraged" and run to the press saying they voted down the such and such bill everyone on the surface should have gotten behind. But actually there is usually more going on.
While that's true, it's always been the case. Both parties have their own versions of most bills because both parties have their own preferred approaches to problems, even on issues where both parties nominally agree there are problems that need government intervention to solve. They then go into good ol' fashioned horse trading.The issue no one ever seems to want to acknowledge is that when a bill is passed from one of the houses with one of the things everyone can agree on, it tends to have all kinds of goodies attached for one party and nothing but cuts for the other. Then when the other party votes against it because of all the add ons their opponents get "outraged" and run to the press saying they voted down the such and such bill everyone on the surface should have gotten behind. But actually there is usually more going on.
