- Aug 11, 2000
- 23,168
- 0
- 71
the definition of GEEK itself has changed since the mid '80's. just the fact that ATers are participating on an online forum is no longer a guarantee or even a strong indication that they are a computer "geek".
why do some ATers want to perpetuate this myth?? particularly in YAGT's.
i don't get it.
is it just a bunch of the older ATer's that just haven't gotten over their own geekiness during the 80's taking it out on the younger ATer's?
edited for clarification
i guess i didn't make myself clear in my OP.
my problem is with the assumption that these so called "geeks" will be socially inept.
i don't think that generalization is anywhere near true anymore.
you HAVE to be a "geek" (have a certain amount of knowledge of computers) to survive in today's world. someone that would pass for a geek 20 yrs ago, now is just barely above average in his knowledge of computers etc.
but really my question is regarding the assumption that all "geeks" are socially inept.
why do some ATers want to perpetuate this myth?? particularly in YAGT's.
i don't get it.
is it just a bunch of the older ATer's that just haven't gotten over their own geekiness during the 80's taking it out on the younger ATer's?
edited for clarification
i guess i didn't make myself clear in my OP.
my problem is with the assumption that these so called "geeks" will be socially inept.
i don't think that generalization is anywhere near true anymore.
you HAVE to be a "geek" (have a certain amount of knowledge of computers) to survive in today's world. someone that would pass for a geek 20 yrs ago, now is just barely above average in his knowledge of computers etc.
but really my question is regarding the assumption that all "geeks" are socially inept.
