What is the real purpose of the X-37?

Status
Not open for further replies.

theflyingpig

Banned
Mar 9, 2008
5,616
18
0
To slaughter the innocent photographers who happen to be traveling with armed esocorts in war zones. That's what we do best, after all. Everyone knows this.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
They say it's used to test launch systems. Rockets in other words. You could mount telemetry in it. It could also be used for cargo deployment. Technically, you could also use it to capture or service satellites. The USAF has a long history of working with NASA. Not everything they build is strictly for combat.
 

SKORPI0

Lifer
Jan 18, 2000
18,482
2,418
136
220px-X-37B_prelaunch.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States
United States' first operational military spaceplane
. :awe:
 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
It was probably designed to launch large spy satellites. The shuttle used do to it for awhile, but since it's going away...
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,875
33,945
136
It is designed to enrich favored contractors...just like every other NASA/Defense project.
 

larryp1315

Junior Member
Apr 20, 2010
2
0
0
It is a space bomber. With this type of system the United States can put ordinance anywhere on the planet within minutes.

First let me say I have no inside information or knowledge about this system. I am not affiliated with any organization nor do I have a relationship with any person in any organization that is working on this project (not revealing secrets from anyone with knowledge of the program) or that has information about this system. I deduced this by looking at the system's general capabilities over alternative systems which could accomplish other missions with existing technology with a shorter delivery and more cheaply.

Reentry can be accomplished for unmanned systems by using many of the proven available reentry systems like parachutes which were used during Apollo. Nothing this system can do along the lines of putting something into orbit and bringing it back is necessary unless you need to do it fast.
The same is true for doing things in space. Maneuvering in space is accomplished using countervailing thrust (Newtons equal and opposite reaction) not resistance. You don't need wings for that job and in fact having wings decreases the usable physical space in the payload bay of any launch vehicle. Which leaves us pondering why would you need to put something into orbit and bring it down to Earth differently than what is currently available and has military applications?

This system will give the U.S. military the ability to put ordnance on target extremely fast (hypersonic speeds) if it was in continuous orbit. It is an unmanned bomber that could take out say Ahmadinejad (love to see that %$&^* go) while he is giving a long speech (he loves to talk and talk and talk, you get the idea). Once we have actionable intelligence which could come from say real-time satellite surveillance the target could be eliminated within minutes of the decision being made.

This is magnitudes better than today's current technology which requires hours even with a system in theater. Because of the speed this system would have from reentry it would also be impossible to stop with current technology (even ours let alone theirs). Because it is over target for only a fraction of the time of other systems it would also give us a way to take out high value targets with plausible deniability. The system would enter and leave the target area at high speed at an angle (along with stealth probably) that would make it undetectable and even if a system failure occurred at those speeds it would burn up in the atmosphere which it would do outside the target area (it would look like a meteor.

There are other uses I'm sure, but this would be my guess of its main mission.
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,502
136
They are sending me up to fix the ionosphere.

Don't worry, they are declassifying it and annoucing it in a few days; they gave me clearance to talk about it freely now.

I have authorization to assemble a crack team of ATOT nerds to assist me in this endeavor. Who's with me?
 

larryp1315

Junior Member
Apr 20, 2010
2
0
0
P.S. For those wondering why we don't just drop ordnance directly from space onto the target it is because that would violate treaties that we are signatories on with the Russians. This is a gray area since the weapon is not used in space or dropped from space unguided. We are "simply" bringing the aircraft back into the atmosphere under guidance then delivering the payload.
 

drinkmorejava

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
3,567
7
81
It is a space bomber. With this type of system the United States can put ordinance anywhere on the planet within minutes.

First let me say I have no inside information or knowledge about this system. I am not affiliated with any organization nor do I have a relationship with any person in any organization that is working on this project (not revealing secrets from anyone with knowledge of the program) or that has information about this system. I deduced this by looking at the system's general capabilities over alternative systems which could accomplish other missions with existing technology with a shorter delivery and more cheaply.

Reentry can be accomplished for unmanned systems by using many of the proven available reentry systems like parachutes which were used during Apollo. Nothing this system can do along the lines of putting something into orbit and bringing it back is necessary unless you need to do it fast.
The same is true for doing things in space. Maneuvering in space is accomplished using countervailing thrust (Newtons equal and opposite reaction) not resistance. You don't need wings for that job and in fact having wings decreases the usable physical space in the payload bay of any launch vehicle. Which leaves us pondering why would you need to put something into orbit and bring it down to Earth differently than what is currently available and has military applications?

This system will give the U.S. military the ability to put ordnance on target extremely fast (hypersonic speeds) if it was in continuous orbit. It is an unmanned bomber that could take out say Ahmadinejad (love to see that %$&^* go) while he is giving a long speech (he loves to talk and talk and talk, you get the idea). Once we have actionable intelligence which could come from say real-time satellite surveillance the target could be eliminated within minutes of the decision being made.

This is magnitudes better than today's current technology which requires hours even with a system in theater. Because of the speed this system would have from reentry it would also be impossible to stop with current technology (even ours let alone theirs). Because it is over target for only a fraction of the time of other systems it would also give us a way to take out high value targets with plausible deniability. The system would enter and leave the target area at high speed at an angle (along with stealth probably) that would make it undetectable and even if a system failure occurred at those speeds it would burn up in the atmosphere which it would do outside the target area (it would look like a meteor.

There are other uses I'm sure, but this would be my guess of its main mission.

? yes, because a supersonic or hypersonic cruise missile would be so much harder? If it's not in space, where again is this thing going to land after it drops it's bombs?

Are you saying it is dropping bombs while re-entering? Speed is not an issue to stop. You forget that something traveling that fast has very little maneuverability. Furthermore, given the thermal and pressure considerations, any significant evasive action will cause it to disintegrate. Also, a hunk of anything traveling through the ionosphere is easy to pick up... if for some reason you don't see the big ball of fire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.