3d rendering. Gaming. Music. Autocad. Etc. Most regular consumers have no need though I'm not a regular consumer so I could care less.
If I had the cash, I'd be rolling at least a 36 core server myself. 3d rendering eats anything you throw at it.
In your case its completely understood. I don't see a large percentage of users working with 3D rendering or Autocad?
In your case its completely understood. I don't see a large percentage of users working with 3D rendering or Autocad?
My company's 3D CAD software and pcb design software both still use one core for pretty much everything. Well, they supposedly use DirectX too but I'm not sure how much.
Research Science for one
You're too late, the FX-9590 thread died like a year ago, and it may be the only affordable 8-core 5GHz CPU we'll see for many years/decades.What is the point of having a desktop with 5Ghz 8-core processor, 64 Gb ram, ? I don't see a purpose for creating computers with such absurd parameters. Where is it going to end, and who is all this progress for?
A holograph is nothing other than a 3d world displayed in a different way,it needs nothing more than your typical (well nowadays typical)3d game.If you want an example of something that would require more CPU power and be useful for normal consumers, then consider holography; real-time generation of holograms at useable resolutions requires massively more computing power than a standard PC has today.
In principle it's easy, but it requires rendering the scene from every possible point of view all at the same time to generate the light field. That's an awful lot of data.A holograph is nothing other than a 3d world displayed in a different way,it needs nothing more than your typical (well nowadays typical)3d game.
I don't know more useless thing then holography .... just like new Iphone 6, 7, 8 or 9 ..... its like fanatic religion.If you can't see the purpose then you lack imagination. The number of possible applications for faster CPUs is limitless, and includes things that no one alive today has even dreamed of yet.
If you want an example of something that would require more CPU power and be useful for normal consumers, then consider holography; real-time generation of holograms at useable resolutions requires massively more computing power than a standard PC has today.
I don't know more useless thing then holography .... just like new Iphone 6, 7, 8 or 9 ..... its like fanatic religion.
What is the point of having a desktop with 5Ghz 8-core processor, 64 Gb ram, ? I don't see a purpose for creating computers with such absurd parameters. Where is it going to end, and who is all this progress for?
Because I don't want to even see a progress bar in between clicking start and 'finished' on intensive tasks :ninja:
Does the OP know that they still make dual cores clocked below 3.0 GHz for those that don't need all that absurdly fast speed?
OP, do you work for Intel planning their cpus? Nobody needs more than 4 cores. Dont want to make the IPC gains too much either.
Because I don't want to even see a progress bar in between clicking start and 'finished' on intensive tasks :ninja:
Well actually when cpu is faster and consumes less power (like what Intel has attempted to do each gen) it consumes less of the earth's resources....You never think about how we spent unproportionally resources of the Earth for such small and unnecessary changes on your system perfomance?