- Jul 9, 2005
- 3,721
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Noobtastic
Is it really that big of a deal?
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: Noobtastic
Is it really that big of a deal?
I believe you mean 1394 port, otherwise known as firewire. It's a common interface like USB 2.0 used to connect peripherals (usually harddrives or digital video cameras)...
Do most people have it?
What about this PS2 adapter? I know what PS2 ports are, but I assumed they came with all mobos...
Originally posted by: Ruger22C
Ain't IEEE 1394 used for network connection, not firewire?
Edit: Hmm, looked it up. You're right.What "is" the network port called, then?
Originally posted by: Ruger22C
Ain't IEEE 1394 used for network connection, not firewire?
Edit: Hmm, looked it up. You're right.What "is" the network port called, then?
Originally posted by: bob4432
yes reading - What "is" the network port called, then?
Originally posted by: gsellis
Firewire (1394 A or B) can be used to network and I have done so when I did not have a cross-over cable and two machines. What Firewire (listed as a iLink port on some laptops and almost all digital video cameras) is good at is streaming content. USB answers interrupts better, so having multiple devices like mice, keyboards, joy sticks are great on USB. But if you add a streaming media such as a video camera, DVD writer, or other big data device, it tends to slow it down. If you are capturing 25Mb/s data stream from a video camera, interrupts can cause dropped frames as it is streaming in real time. Firewire handles the traffic better and will not drop the frames. On paper, USB and Firewire (A) have about the same data rates, but Firewire transfer data with more resilience and gets better performance at the maximum end of the transfer rate.
Hmm... I never noticed that. Well, there goes a great idea for USMT.Originally posted by: bsobel
Under XP. Vista has removed the firewire networking option since gigabit networking is common and cheaper.