-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
What is the difference between fine and applied art?
- Thread starter CoolTech
- Start date
MercenaryForHire
Lifer
NogginBoink
Diamond Member
Fine art has no practical value whatsoever.
Applied art is at least somewhat useful.
(My mostly cynical but not altogether untrue answer.)
Applied art is at least somewhat useful.
(My mostly cynical but not altogether untrue answer.)
UnatcoAgent
Diamond Member
Fine art is simply for art's sake, no practical use.
Applied art has more of a use to it, but is still.. for art.. sake...
Design is totally practical, not for art sake (I study design 🙂)
Applied art has more of a use to it, but is still.. for art.. sake...
Design is totally practical, not for art sake (I study design 🙂)
WinkOsmosis
Banned
That is it. To everyone talking about art being useless, I never, ever want to see you complain about the Pontiac Aztek being ugly.
UnatcoAgent
Diamond Member
Who said there were no bad designers in this world ?
Edit - I do not mean that art is totally useless, however fine art is very much for the sake of art, it is there to look pretty or trigger some sense. Something, I don't study fine art.
Design is practical, it is made to solve problems etc. The aztec is a poor design, simply because it is ugly. There is a ton of horrible design in this world.
So really I don't understand what you mean by your post with regards to mine
😕