hal2kilo
Lifer
- Feb 24, 2009
- 25,944
- 12,214
- 136
You're from California? Makes sense now......
Its not 'southwestern', is called mf'in Texmex.
As for op, Texas is best because Texas.
TexMex...lol you mean putting a buncha limp soggy peppers in perfectly good Mexican food? Nasty! No wonder the Mexicans kicked your asses so hard at the Alamo.
When you guys grow some mountains and learn what a avacado is get back to me.
When you guys grow some mountains and learn what a avacado is get back to me.
California is obviously the best. The best weather, most beautiful scenery, best food, best weed, home of Silicon Valley, great universities, and home of the World Series Champion San Francisco Giants !
There are better Universities, but CA clearly has the advantage of overall quality. well...if the UC system weren't so fucking broke.
that leaves Stanford, Cal Tech...and if you want to count the useless meatheads at USC, I guess. :\
But, other than that, it's really hard to beat all that is available here. Too fucking expensive, though. Not sure how much longer I'm going to stay.
Isn't Seattle U a 4 year? What about PLU and UPS? I realize some of those are outside Seattle a bit, and some are religious based. As for the other major Universities being spread about the state, I am glad that is the case. Kids need to get away from home during college, and since most come from the Seattle/King County area, it is good there are choices out there. I went to CWU fwiw, and loved the Ellensburg area every minute I was there. Remember too, most of these uni's are 100 or so years old, so it was more important they were spread out.
Right now the major uni's are spread perfectly: Seattle (UW), northwest population center (WWU), central wa (CWU), eastern WA (WSU, EWU, Gonzaga). The southwest population center is served by whatever is in portcouver.
One of the great aspects of WA is the incredible diversity in the land. We have coastal, inland sea/sound, islands, alpine, rain forest, high desert, .etc all in one state. I could show people pics from eastern WA and they would guess they are looking at AZ. WA is also by far the most forested state in the union. Couple that with the historical importance of Salmon and environmental issues tend to be important.
fivethirtyeight.com had an interesting write up on WA. Politically, WA is an interesting case. Very socially liberal, but fiscally conservative. In fact, taxes and other fiscal issues could cost the D's some seats, but the R's here have to be different than they are nationally. Good read if you have a few minutes, a few other interesting quirks are pointed out.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/washington-state-womens-rights-and-big-cities/
If I had to live somewhere else, Montana would be my vote.
/homer
IMHO the answer can be found by examining each state and determining which of them is the most libertarian in practice.That is which state is the most business friendly, has the easiest path toward individuals being able to start their own businesses with little fuss in terms of government regulations, fees or taxes, which state provides and actively promotes a lowest cost of living (which in turn also provides for a highest standard of living) via its economic policies towards businesses and individuals, etc.Then on the social level the freedoms would need to be mirrored socially as they are economically in terms of government staying out the way of people socially as well as economically. After that then you can go about decided about more trivial aspects such as weather or attractive sites, etc.