What is the appeal of a fisheye lens?

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
I guess it's more of a personal preference. I myself don't like them either.
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
So you can see more of the action, they're a extremely wide angle lens. Skateboard videos use them so it's easier for someone to film and get the trick (I'm guessing). I think the effect looks neat if not overdone.
 

Saint Nick

Lifer
Jan 21, 2005
17,722
6
81
Originally posted by: clamum
So you can see more of the action, they're a extremely wide angle lens. Skateboard videos use them so it's easier for someone to film and get the trick (I'm guessing). I think the effect looks neat if not overdone.

yep.. makes the trick look bigger too.
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
Originally posted by: jndietz
Originally posted by: clamum
So you can see more of the action, they're a extremely wide angle lens. Skateboard videos use them so it's easier for someone to film and get the trick (I'm guessing). I think the effect looks neat if not overdone.

yep.. makes the trick look bigger too.

Yeah I didn't think of that before but it does
 

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
Originally posted by: clamum
Originally posted by: jndietz
Originally posted by: clamum
So you can see more of the action, they're a extremely wide angle lens. Skateboard videos use them so it's easier for someone to film and get the trick (I'm guessing). I think the effect looks neat if not overdone.

yep.. makes the trick look bigger too.

Yeah I didn't think of that before but it does

Eh, to me it's just making the trick look fake. EVERY skateboarding video uses fisheyes ad nauseum... completely unoriginal now IMHO.
 

shilala

Lifer
Oct 5, 2004
11,437
1
76
I take enough fvcked up pictures, I don't have any desire for one.
I take that back...
I'd like to take some pics around fast water with one. Some kind of waterfall, splashing, over rocks thing would probably be cool.
 

NogginBoink

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
5,322
0
0
Creating a super-wide-angle lens that doesn't distort is either really, really, really expensive or flat-out impossible.

The fisheye lens lets you get a wide field of view that you just can't get with any other lens. The distortion is a side effect of the wide angle design; not a feature.
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
Originally posted by: NogginBoink
Creating a super-wide-angle lens that doesn't distort is either really, really, really expensive or flat-out impossible.

The fisheye lens lets you get a wide field of view that you just can't get with any other lens. The distortion is a side effect of the wide angle design; not a feature.

I disagree.
There are 18-25mm fisheye zooms and there are 12-24mm non-fisheye zooms.
There are 15mm primes, and 17mm fisheye primes from the same line of lenses.
 

Mark R

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,513
16
81
There is a problem converting a 'spherical' view of a 3D world into a flat view on a piece of film (or sensor). The geometry of the 2 is different and it isn't possible to convert one to the other without some type of distortion.

You can either choose a rectilinear projection (a 'normal' lens is of this type) this preserves straight lines, but at wide angles you get very uneven magnification of the image - the edges will be magnified more than the centre (similar to the way the arctic/antarctic are magnified on a standard Mercator projection map).

Alternatively you can use a spherical projection (fisheye) - this gives an even magnification across the picture, but straight lines will become curved.

It is impossible for a rectilienar projetion to achieve 180 degrees of view - and the distortion becomes so severe that it is impractical at more than about 120 degrees.