what is KFC anyway?

[hg321]

Originally posted by: yukichigai
Apparantly the "chickens" KFC uses are actually genetically engineered to have no beaks, feathers or feet. It was debatable whether or not they could legally call it chicken.

Text

 

[SackOfAllTrades]

Originally posted by: yukichigai
This was on CNN a while ago. A long while ago, but a while ago nonetheless. Perhaps they've changed that since.

And Jesus, aren't we touchy? This is the kind of responce I'd expect if I'd said <insert religious figure> was a <retard, hermaphrodite, etc>, not from insulting a fast food chain. 😛

CNN = Chicken Nonsense Network?

 

[yukichigai]

Originally posted by: hg321

Originally posted by: yukichigai
Apparantly the "chickens" KFC uses are actually genetically engineered to have no beaks, feathers or feet. It was debatable whether or not they could legally call it chicken.

Text

Meh, my memory is pretty bad. I've read so much stuff on snopes it all blurs. Ahh well.

Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

 

[SackOfAllTrades]

Originally posted by: yukichigai


Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

Just because you are being corrected from spreading incorrect statements(especially when a link that has already said otherwise has been posted) doesn't make everyone here touchy, or are you just being too defensive?

 

[spidey07]

Originally posted by: yukichigai

Originally posted by: hg321

Originally posted by: yukichigai
Apparantly the "chickens" KFC uses are actually genetically engineered to have no beaks, feathers or feet. It was debatable whether or not they could legally call it chicken.

Text

Meh, my memory is pretty bad. I've read so much stuff on snopes it all blurs. Ahh well.

Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

DUDE! Think about it. You actually believed in a genetically engineered chicken with no beaks, feathers or feet. We're not getting overly touchy...just laughing at you.
😉

 

[yukichigai]

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: yukichigai

Originally posted by: hg321

Originally posted by: yukichigai
Apparantly the "chickens" KFC uses are actually genetically engineered to have no beaks, feathers or feet. It was debatable whether or not they could legally call it chicken.

Text

Meh, my memory is pretty bad. I've read so much stuff on snopes it all blurs. Ahh well.

Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

DUDE! Think about it. You actually believed in a genetically engineered chicken with no beaks, feathers or feet. We're not getting overly touchy...just laughing at you.
😉

I used to have chickens years ago. Once or twice some were born missing parts, like a foot, or they had a huge bald patch. Not that far-fetched from what I've seen.

Of course we did live next to a river with a high mercury content. 😛

 

[spidey07]

Originally posted by: yukichigai

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: yukichigai

Originally posted by: hg321

Originally posted by: yukichigai
Apparantly the "chickens" KFC uses are actually genetically engineered to have no beaks, feathers or feet. It was debatable whether or not they could legally call it chicken.

Text

Meh, my memory is pretty bad. I've read so much stuff on snopes it all blurs. Ahh well.

Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

DUDE! Think about it. You actually believed in a genetically engineered chicken with no beaks, feathers or feet. We're not getting overly touchy...just laughing at you.
😉

I used to have chickens years ago. Once or twice some were born missing parts, like a foot, or they had a huge bald patch. Not that far-fetched from what I've seen.

Of course we did live next to a river with a high mercury content. 😛

nice one. Thread sucessfully hijacked.
:beer:

 

[yukichigai]

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: yukichigai

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: yukichigai

Originally posted by: hg321

Originally posted by: yukichigai
Apparantly the "chickens" KFC uses are actually genetically engineered to have no beaks, feathers or feet. It was debatable whether or not they could legally call it chicken.

Text

Meh, my memory is pretty bad. I've read so much stuff on snopes it all blurs. Ahh well.

Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

DUDE! Think about it. You actually believed in a genetically engineered chicken with no beaks, feathers or feet. We're not getting overly touchy...just laughing at you.
😉

I used to have chickens years ago. Once or twice some were born missing parts, like a foot, or they had a huge bald patch. Not that far-fetched from what I've seen.

Of course we did live next to a river with a high mercury content. 😛

nice one. Thread sucessfully hijacked.
:beer:

Sweet! For once in my life I'm in control! 😛

 

[mugs]

Originally posted by: Excelsior

Originally posted by: HajikuFlip
KFC's actual chicken is the suq. But their chicken wings, mashed potatoes, gravy, biscuits, and other food products rock. 😀

I take it you have never had Bojangles.

For the record, Bojangles > KFC.

Maryland Fried Chicken > Kentucky Fried Chicken.

 

[BrunoPuntzJones]

Originally posted by: SackOfAllTrades

Originally posted by: yukichigai


Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

Just because you are being corrected from spreading incorrect statements(especially when a link that has already said otherwise has been posted) doesn't make everyone here touchy, or are you just being too defensive?

He's being hammered for not reading the thread.

 

[SackOfAllTrades]

Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones

Originally posted by: SackOfAllTrades

Originally posted by: yukichigai


Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

Just because you are being corrected from spreading incorrect statements(especially when a link that has already said otherwise has been posted) doesn't make everyone here touchy, or are you just being too defensive?

He's being hammered for not reading the thread.

Ok so that's TWO lessons? 🙂

 

[zimu]

hmm. i feel like kfc right abotu now. anyone in nyc? 😉

 

[yukichigai]

Originally posted by: SackOfAllTrades

Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones

Originally posted by: SackOfAllTrades

Originally posted by: yukichigai


Still, way to get overly touchy folks.

Just because you are being corrected from spreading incorrect statements(especially when a link that has already said otherwise has been posted) doesn't make everyone here touchy, or are you just being too defensive?

He's being hammered for not reading the thread.

Ok so that's TWO lessons? 🙂

Don't worry, I'll forget them in a few days. 😛

 

[SackOfAllTrades]

Originally posted by: yukichigai

Ok so that's TWO lessons? 🙂

Don't worry, I'll forget them in a few days. 😛[/quote]

Just remember:

Lesson 1: Refer to lesson 2.
Lesson 2: Lesson 1 is full of sh!t.