The odds of Zen landing as a Conroe-esque counterpunch are quite slim. The process gap won't be quite as severe as AMD has had to deal with the last few years, but it will still be a very real thing. I think what we'll see is a jump back to Phenom II era competitiveness with the top end Zen trading blows with top end i5 models and some specific workloads nipping at the heels of some i7 ones. Additionally, I'd guess that they will run a little hotter and draw a little more power but come at attractive price points. AMD will be fine in the long run, they have nice safe business in the consoles and graphics divisions and who knows, maybe Zen and K12 will round the CPU division back into shape.
What happens to the AMD64 patent that Intel relies on...that's my concern. I'm unsure of what the negotiated deal is right now with that.
They have 800 million in cash on hand... In other words, they aren't going bankrupt.
They will very likely declare bankruptcy at some point, or be sold just before that happens.
If they manage to emerge from bankruptcy mostly intact (minus the x86 business), it would make sense for them to continue to work on semi-custom ARM chips and perhaps continue to sell dGPUs like today.
The problem is that Zen is the wrong product at the wrong time. Consumers aren't really buying PCs, they are buying smartphones. And the ones that are they are buying Bay Trail (and not even Core). Corporations are buying PCs, but they have always ignored AMD... and won't start now obviously considering they want laptops and low power desktops.
AMD has a $633M bond payment due at the end of 2017 and another big chunk of the $2.3B owed 2 years later. One of the other posters said that AMD has said that they need $600M cash on hand to be able to continue. You do the math.
Now they might be able to get the junk bond dealers to buy some more bonds (to pay for the current ones), but that's only going to happen if the dealers are really desperate.
I'm sure if AMD posts any kind of loss you will see more job cuts and especially cuts in R&D. Which will lead to more stuff getting delayed or cancelled, which leads to less sales, and well you see where that leads to. I mean that's why the Zen APUs and K12 got delayed into 2017.
The problem is that Zen is the wrong product at the wrong time. Consumers aren't really buying PCs, they are buying smartphones. And the ones that are they are buying Bay Trail (and not even Core). Corporations are buying PCs, but they have always ignored AMD... and won't start now obviously considering they want laptops and low power desktops.
What happens to the AMD64 patent that Intel relies on...that's my concern. I'm unsure of what the negotiated deal is right now with that.
AMD has a $633M bond payment due at the end of 2017 and another big chunk of the $2.3B owed 2 years later. One of the other posters said that AMD has said that they need $600M cash on hand to be able to continue. You do the math.
AMD has a $633M bond payment due at the end of 2017 and another big chunk of the $2.3B owed 2 years later. One of the other posters said that AMD has said that they need $600M cash on hand to be able to continue. You do the math.
I'm sure if AMD posts any kind of loss you will see more job cuts and especially cuts in R&D. Which will lead to more stuff getting delayed or cancelled, which leads to less sales, and well you see where that leads to. I mean that's why the Zen APUs and K12 got delayed into 2017.
AMD Zen based APUs were always going to launch only in 2017. Thats how it happened with Trinity launching in mid-2012 after Bulldozer launched in Q3 2011. You cannot design a APU with a grounds up new CPU core without first designing it and testing it as a standalone CPU product.
Why not? That's how they did it for Bobcat and Jaguar, worked out pretty well.
To be honest, I think the delay in APUs is because they are waiting for HBM prices to come down.
Even with current or older arch' an APU on a competitive node and sporting HBM would be the answer to many prayers.
