What is an 80486 Processor

Mar 19, 2003
18,289
2
71
The 80486 (usually referred to as just the "486") was in widespread use about fifteen years ago (before the introduction of the original Pentium)...in any case, it's just an x86 chip, and as such, any current Athlon will work with code "requiring" a 486. :)
 

vegetation

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
4,270
2
0
80586 = Pentium, or generation after the 80486; just that Intel lost a case (and rightly so) trying to trademark '586' so they switched to the name Pentium. The rest is history.

Edit: If Intel had it their way, the Pentium II would have been named the 80686, P3 the 80786, and P4 80886.
 

Sunner

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
11,641
0
76
Originally posted by: vegetation
80586 = Pentium, or generation after the 80486; just that Intel lost a case (and rightly so) trying to trademark '586' so they switched to the name Pentium. The rest is history.

Edit: If Intel had it their way, the Pentium II would have been named the 80686, P3 the 80786, and P4 80886.

The P4 should have been the 80786, seeing as the P-iii still used the P6 architecture.
 

xsilver

Senior member
Aug 9, 2001
470
0
0
if there's a program that requires a 486 processor, it probably wont work very well on an newish athlon
it will just run too damn fast --- you'll need a program to manually degrade the cpu to an appropiate speed

you should have seen an ega version of frogger on a p2 machine run --- even deep blue wouldn't have had a chance --- frogger = roadkill :p
 
Nov 11, 2004
10,855
0
0
You mean those games that were timed by the CPU clocks?
I remember my friend trying to play some old DOS game on an A64 and got "pwnted" within 2 seconds. :)
 

Spikesoldier

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2001
6,766
0
0
Originally posted by: Kensai
You mean those games that were timed by the CPU clocks?
I remember my friend trying to play some old DOS game on an A64 and got "pwnted" within 2 seconds. :)

 

vegetation

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
4,270
2
0
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: vegetation
80586 = Pentium, or generation after the 80486; just that Intel lost a case (and rightly so) trying to trademark '586' so they switched to the name Pentium. The rest is history.

Edit: If Intel had it their way, the Pentium II would have been named the 80686, P3 the 80786, and P4 80886.

The P4 should have been the 80786, seeing as the P-iii still used the P6 architecture.

Marketing could care less about the architecture in naming convention. Intel simply wanted more sales.
 

aplefka

Lifer
Feb 29, 2004
12,014
2
0
Originally posted by: Kensai
You mean those games that were timed by the CPU clocks?
I remember my friend trying to play some old DOS game on an A64 and got "pwnted" within 2 seconds. :)

Yeah, even on an Athlon XP 2100+ games like that ran so horribly for me. If that's the game requirement, even if it's a classic, I suggest putting it on another system to see how it'll run.
 

xsilver

Senior member
Aug 9, 2001
470
0
0
Originally posted by: Kensai
You mean those games that were timed by the CPU clocks?
I remember my friend trying to play some old DOS game on an A64 and got "pwnted" within 2 seconds. :)


yup -- but you would already get pwned on a p2, let alone a a64!!!
the graphics were moving so fast, it looked liked it was skipping frames
even back in the day, you had to turn your 486 dx2 to turbo "off" for half speed (25/33mhz) otherwise the game would already be super hard (eg. 50/66mhz = too hard)

there are programs though that fix this problem
the other option is to get the game via mame emulator, if classic pacman or 1942 is your thing :)
 

aplefka

Lifer
Feb 29, 2004
12,014
2
0
Originally posted by: Kensai
As usual, nobody really *reads* the post. My friend plays DOS, I play WoW. ;)

How were we supposed to pick that up from the context of your post? I mean honestly, in a thread having to do with 486 processors it's not out of the question that you meant DOS. :p
 

xsilver

Senior member
Aug 9, 2001
470
0
0
Originally posted by: Kensai
As usual, nobody really *reads* the post. My friend plays DOS, I play WoW. ;)


huh? I understood what you said
I just thought we were having a bit of a flashback to 486 days :)
sarcasm is a bit hard to fathom through type sometimes though :)

and lol - I dont think you can get pwned in 2 secs in WOW anyways....
 

hopejr

Senior member
Nov 8, 2004
841
0
0
Microprose F19 seems to work on newer processors at the correct speed (even though it was written back in the days of the 286).
 

odbasucanc

Junior Member
Apr 23, 2005
18
0
0
i remember when 486s came out. i wanted one... i got a cyrix upgrade chip for my 386sx... lol slow
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
i never thought i'd see the day when someone asked what that is....
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,098
32,645
146
Originally posted by: odbasucanc
i remember when 486s came out. i wanted one... i got a cyrix upgrade chip for my 386sx... lol slow
I was an Amiga user at that point.

 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
no by 486 times games weren't clock based..he's playing something much olde
 

TStep

Platinum Member
Feb 16, 2003
2,460
10
81
Originally posted by: hopejr
Microprose F19 seems to work on newer processors at the correct speed (even though it was written back in the days of the 286).
That game just amazed me. That must have been late 80s, no? I think I had a 386/16mhz or 25mhz at that point:)

 

Sithtiger

Member
Apr 4, 2005
177
0
76
Originally posted by: xsilver
if there's a program that requires a 486 processor, it probably wont work very well on an newish athlon
it will just run too damn fast --- you'll need a program to manually degrade the cpu to an appropiate speed

you should have seen an ega version of frogger on a p2 machine run --- even deep blue wouldn't have had a chance --- frogger = roadkill :p


Ya never know, I still have my original Doom diskeetes and it runs fine on my P4 3GHz and Radeon 9800P running WinXP Pro. I imagine it would work on the yet to be released A64 X2 dual core processors too. I doubt it would work on the 64-bit WinXP though.