What is a good alternative to symantec antivirus

blackrain

Golden Member
Feb 15, 2005
1,226
0
71
Symantec has a program that runs in the task manager call RTVScan, which takes up a huge amount of memory, especially during the startup. Startup feels like an eternity. I am wondering whether there are any good alternatives that don't cause such slow startups and memory usage problems.

Systems specs:

P4 1.8 Ghz
640mb ram
BFG 7800GS OC
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,700
4,661
75
Avira Anti-Vir. There's a free nag version, and it gets more viruses than most, too!
 

dguy6789

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2002
8,558
3
76
My recommendation is Microsoft Security Essentials. Unlike Avira and AVG, it's not an advertisement, there is no pay version. It uses a low amount of resources, starts up quick, and never bothers you with pointless messages like the other two do.
 

AFurryReptile

Golden Member
Nov 5, 2006
1,998
1
76
My recommendation is Microsoft Security Essentials. Unlike Avira and AVG, it's not an advertisement, there is no pay version. It uses a low amount of resources, starts up quick, and never bothers you with pointless messages like the other two do.

I'll second this. I've been using it for a month and had some good results. It's among the only six AV's to receive a "Good" on malware detection and removal at AV-comparitives.org as well.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,137
10,608
126
My recommendation is Microsoft Security Essentials. ...It uses a low amount of resources...

Low amount of resources? It ran at over 100mb, and peaked at over 300mb. Compared with Avira using 12mb, with a 140mb peak.
 

dguy6789

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2002
8,558
3
76
I just checked mine right now and MSE is using 3.8MB of ram in the background. It jumped up to 4.4MB when I opened it.

Edit: I'm doing a full system scan, it's sitting at about 4.7MB of ram usage and not rising.
 
Last edited:

phantom404

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2004
1,460
2
81
Low amount of resources? It ran at over 100mb, and peaked at over 300mb. Compared with Avira using 12mb, with a 140mb peak.

My process is running at 772k right now. ~3MB while doing a full scan. That is of course im looking at the right process....msseces.exe.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,137
10,608
126
My process is running at 772k right now. ~3MB while doing a full scan. That is of course im looking at the right process....msseces.exe.

There's 2 processes. I don't remember what the other one's called.

Edit:

MsMpEng.exe Is the other process.
 
Last edited:

phantom404

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2004
1,460
2
81
I see it now, had to click show processes from all users. Its going back and forth from about 70MB to 75MB doing a scan. On idle its about 50MB

There's 2 processes. I don't remember what the other one's called.

Edit:

MsMpEng.exe Is the other process.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,137
10,608
126
I see it now, had to click show processes from all users. Its going back and forth from about 70MB to 75MB doing a scan. On idle its about 50MB

What O/S are you on? I had the Vista64 version. It should use more resources than the 32bit, but I wouldn't expect a tremendous amount of difference.
 

alexruiz

Platinum Member
Sep 21, 2001
2,836
556
126
What version of norton are you using?
2009 was a radical departure form the resources hogs of previous years...