Originally posted by: flexy
war is reality, true.
But war is also always the LAST ressort when common sense, or reasoning, or morales, or whatever FAILS.
If two people have an argument ("IS VISTA better than XP ?") and they cant settle the argument,do you think it's the better way to solve
differences in an opinion by smashing each other's face in ? (Or, respectively, due to lack of arguments, start using swear-words ?)
And then say "oh..i like war/violence/smashing faces in"...and dont even bother what the underlying reason for it is
This must be (sorry)..the MOST stupidest thing i've ever read here.
From that point of view you would be the ideal candidate to fight for WHATEVER reason....eg. even if some second hitler told you to fight WHOMEVER you would do it because "you like war" without even asking the morale behind if.
Besides..i cant see any real soldier,. someone who has been in battle "liking" war. The few i know which came back from Iraq for sure did NOT.
btw... "War, to me, is the only way to achieve peace. " <--
btw...see YOUR ARGUMENT.
So was arguing Saddam H, Hitler, whoever..."oh, we have some citizens which are not satisfied with how we rule our gvt"..so let's use military and torture to bring order <-- is the same view, except that violence is used against the own citizens. They could also have said "hmm..let's think...maybe we could give our citizens more freedom, less censorship, more freedom of speech"..but instead chose violence.
So..let's just slay every oponent of our (your ?) opinion...kill them..and then we have peace ?
HWould you also say "war is the only way to achieve peace" if you were a chinese citizen, or a north korean citizen ?
I mean..wouldnt you be here on the forum now and say that it would be REALLY, REALLY GOOD to start a war with the usa because you think war with the usa would be the only way to achieve peace ? (Or minimize the 'threat' ?) etc..etc...