skyking
Lifer
- Nov 21, 2001
- 21,997
- 4,739
- 146
this would do it, OP. Post up a picture of yourself with a sign " this is Marius from ATOT" and we will focus on your postings anew.
Dear readers and all honest intelligent productive posters here, I say innumerable times already: that God for me is in concept the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
Take notice that atheists and my opponents here are not or cannot be against God in my concept, but against God in religion, like in Christianism, Islamism, and orthodox Judaism.
The God in religion is omnipotent, omni-benevolent, omni-just, He picks a people for His very own, punishes sinners and rewards saints, etc.
This is the God that atheists and my opponents here are nurturing hate, grudge, and enmity against, why?
You ask them, the atheists and my opponents here, and if they at least be once honest, intelligent, and productive with their thinking, they will tell you why?
But let you be armchair psychologists, and you will know why.
Take notice that atheists and my opponents here are not or cannot be against God in my concept, but against God in religion, like in Christianism, Islamism, and orthodox Judaism.
The God in religion is omnipotent, omni-benevolent, omni-just, He picks a people for His very own, punishes sinners and rewards saints, etc.
This is the God that atheists and my opponents here are nurturing hate, grudge, and enmity against, why?
You ask them, the atheists and my opponents here, and if they at least be once honest, intelligent, and productive with their thinking, they will tell you why?
But let you be armchair psychologists, and you will know why.
WelshBloke
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2005
- 30,423
- 8,090
- 136
Dude, we dont hate your god, we just think that its a figment of your imagination.
ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 37,759
- 18,038
- 146
His armchair psychology > yours
Seriously, his posts are basically "believe in my concept of God, or you're a dum dum"
Dear Welshbloke:
You declare of yourself:
That is what you are deficient with, for being in fact yourself a bot, bots don't have imagination at all, they have programming and database, but imagination - never, impossible.
Now, dear readers and fellow honest intelligent productive posters here, today I will share with you, if I have not already done so previously, namely:
This is how you can and will out talk anyone, Ask him to that you and he, both will work as to concur on what is existence? And he will get lost right away.
You know why? Because humans though they or we be classified as homo* sapiens, meaning living entity of intelligence, the greatest majority of folks never use their intelligence to even think about what is existence.
*Homo here means human in Latin, while in Greek it means "the same" as with homosexual men, i.e. men having sex with fellow men, how they do it? Use your imagination, unless you be robots here.
Hahahahahaha...
You declare of yourself:
- Dude, we dont hate your god, we just think that its a figment of your imagination.
That is what you are deficient with, for being in fact yourself a bot, bots don't have imagination at all, they have programming and database, but imagination - never, impossible.
Now, dear readers and fellow honest intelligent productive posters here, today I will share with you, if I have not already done so previously, namely:
This is how you can and will out talk anyone, Ask him to that you and he, both will work as to concur on what is existence? And he will get lost right away.
You know why? Because humans though they or we be classified as homo* sapiens, meaning living entity of intelligence, the greatest majority of folks never use their intelligence to even think about what is existence.
*Homo here means human in Latin, while in Greek it means "the same" as with homosexual men, i.e. men having sex with fellow men, how they do it? Use your imagination, unless you be robots here.
Hahahahahaha...
WelshBloke
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2005
- 30,423
- 8,090
- 136
Dear readers and all honest intelligent productive posters here, I will now be expounding on what is existence, for with our knowledge on what is existence, we will come to the certainty that God exists, in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
Let us start with an example of existence, namely, the nose on our face.
Touch the nose on your face, everyone, see?
That is an example of existence, in fact all things that we can touch, see, hear, taste, smell, and also be aware of by our what I call super sense of consciousness, all of them are examples of existence.
This is enough for today, tomorrow more on what and how we know existence.
Let us start with an example of existence, namely, the nose on our face.
Touch the nose on your face, everyone, see?
That is an example of existence, in fact all things that we can touch, see, hear, taste, smell, and also be aware of by our what I call super sense of consciousness, all of them are examples of existence.
This is enough for today, tomorrow more on what and how we know existence.
Dear readers and posters, I will now continue and resume my exposition on what is existence and how we come to know existence.
Yesterday I told you that:
Now, imagine that you ask me:
That is a very good question, and it is evidence that you sons of your mother respectively, (de patre nihil certum*) you are not bots here in AnandTech.
And here is my answer, and please let you read carefully and thoughtfully:
ANNEX
Yesterday I told you that:
- Touch the nose on your face, everyone, see?
That is an example of existence, in fact all things that we can touch, see, hear, taste, smell, and also be aware of by our what I call super sense of consciousness, all of them are examples of existence.
Now, imagine that you ask me:
- Hey, what about things which we do not have access to with our external senses of sight hearing touch taste smell and the super sense of consciousness? In particular, your God, which you tell us, in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning?
That is a very good question, and it is evidence that you sons of your mother respectively, (de patre nihil certum*) you are not bots here in AnandTech.
And here is my answer, and please let you read carefully and thoughtfully:
- Don't you notice that everything you know to exist and because you have access to them with your external senses of sight hearing touch taste and smell, and also with your super sense of consciousness, don't you observe that they all have a beginning?
Here is where you must bring in your mind by which you think, so that if you have no mind, then you can't think at all, and you don't belong to the tribe known as homo sapiens i.e. in English, live entity with intelligence.
For God Whom you cannot access with your external senses etc etc etc, you have got to avail yourselves of your mind, to think unto God's existence.
This way:
- 1. Everything with a beginning has need of another thing to bring it into existence.
2. And this another thing if also with a beginning has need of another thing to come into existence.
3. Now, this series of thing depending on another thing to come into existence, the series cannot go on and on and on without end.
4. Otherwise we will die and thus cease to exist while the series is still going on and on and on...
5. The series has got to stop at an entity that has no beginning, wherefore no need for another entity to bring it to existence.
6. And this ultimate entity without any beginning, that is the entity that in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
7. Therefore: Summing up, God exists in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
There, my dear readers and posters here, as you have a mind to think, for objects that are beyond our external senses of sight etc dtc etc, you have also access to, by your mind in order to do what? To do honest intelligent productive thinking.
Let me meet a bright mind here to ask me about my message for today, okay?
- 1. Everything with a beginning has need of another thing to bring it into existence.
ANNEX
*De patre nihil certum = Latin, of the father nothing certain. (softly, hehehehehe)
The last line of my message yesterday is the following:
"Let me meet a bright mind here to ask me about my message for today, okay?"
This morning I have not seen any message from anyone, not even the repetitious poster talking about Eris pads her chest.
What happened? No one bright here, not even the new atheists who want mankind to call them, Brights?
Or my opponents here have all become gentlemen intellectuals, whereas before in a moment of impatience from my part I call them filthy posters - because their messages are reminiscent of their posterior's effluence or their reproductive (no, not honest intelligent productive thinking) lower frontal anatomy and physiology.
Well, that is one very rare but most exhilarating experience for me here in AnandTech.
Annex
"Let me meet a bright mind here to ask me about my message for today, okay?"
This morning I have not seen any message from anyone, not even the repetitious poster talking about Eris pads her chest.
What happened? No one bright here, not even the new atheists who want mankind to call them, Brights?
Or my opponents here have all become gentlemen intellectuals, whereas before in a moment of impatience from my part I call them filthy posters - because their messages are reminiscent of their posterior's effluence or their reproductive (no, not honest intelligent productive thinking) lower frontal anatomy and physiology.
Well, that is one very rare but most exhilarating experience for me here in AnandTech.
Annex
ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 37,759
- 18,038
- 146
Dear ch33zw1z:
It is most edifying that from your part you recognize and admit clearly that you and your companions,
No longer, just continue to read my posts here.
Today I will tell you, next time you meet with people who love to talk on transcendental things, like what comes after death, is there a purpose to life, to the universe, and how did we get here, etc etc etc.
You put up a solemn face, and sneak in this statement, with a most grave voice:
It is most edifying that from your part you recognize and admit clearly that you and your companions,
- Yes, you (Marius) know all, and we're all dum dums.
No longer, just continue to read my posts here.
Today I will tell you, next time you meet with people who love to talk on transcendental things, like what comes after death, is there a purpose to life, to the universe, and how did we get here, etc etc etc.
You put up a solemn face, and sneak in this statement, with a most grave voice:
- You all know? I always find it most amazing that we humans are the only live entities that think and talk about existence.
Try that, and report back here.
ANNEX
Dear everyone here and my opponents also and all atheists:
In an earlier post I said the following text:
Now I will volunteer my opinion on why atheists and my opponents here are nurturing hate, grudge, and enmity against God.
First, it is not the God in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning, but the God of religion, the God that "picks a people for His very own, punishes sinners and rewards saints, etc."
This is a kill-joy, anti-libertinism, contra-licenses kind of God. And that is why atheists and my opponents here have nothing but enmity against Him.
In an earlier post I said the following text:
Now I will volunteer my opinion on why atheists and my opponents here are nurturing hate, grudge, and enmity against God.
First, it is not the God in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning, but the God of religion, the God that "picks a people for His very own, punishes sinners and rewards saints, etc."
This is a kill-joy, anti-libertinism, contra-licenses kind of God. And that is why atheists and my opponents here have nothing but enmity against Him.
- Oct 10, 1999
- 30,875
- 12,380
- 136
ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 37,759
- 18,038
- 146
Dear readers and my opponents and atheists:
You are barking up the wrong tree.
I am into God from reason, not God from religion.
God from religion is the God in the Bible, the author of the so-called 10 Commandments.
God from reason is in concept the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
You all are just against the God of religion, of the Bible, even though the Bible also has at its very first words the following declaration:
You are barking up the wrong tree.
I am into God from reason, not God from religion.
God from religion is the God in the Bible, the author of the so-called 10 Commandments.
God from reason is in concept the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
You all are just against the God of religion, of the Bible, even though the Bible also has at its very first words the following declaration:
- In the beginning God made heaven and earth.
ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 37,759
- 18,038
- 146
Dear readers and my opponents here and atheists:
My emphasis now is to tell you, ye all who are into denying God exists, that you are after denying God's existence, but it is the God of religion, not the God of reason.
You are barking up at the right tree when you realize that it is the God of religion, not the God of reason.
Consider that if you insist on getting all mixed up with the God of religion and the God of reason, you are into irrationality.
I am not into propounding the God of religion, an example of which is God in the Bible.
Here is my reasoning on establishing the existence of the God of reason, which in concept for me is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
Yesterday I contributed (see quote below) this line of reasoning in the website of an ex-atheist, he knows the distinction between God of reason and God of religion.
What I want you to do is to tell me where I am not into rational discourse with my reasoning on God exists, in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
So, it is not enough that you just declare that you deny God's existence whether of reason or of religion.
You owe it to your membership in the club of homo sapiens,* to tell me what is your reasoning on which you ground your declaration against God's existence altogether.
*homo sapiens = in Latin, live entity with intelligence, the Latin word homo means a human being, and for your curiosity homo is also a Greek word (in its own Greek writing, but both are transcribed in English alphabet by the letters h o m o; take notice that homo in Greek means similar, like as in homosexual.
My emphasis now is to tell you, ye all who are into denying God exists, that you are after denying God's existence, but it is the God of religion, not the God of reason.
You are barking up at the right tree when you realize that it is the God of religion, not the God of reason.
Consider that if you insist on getting all mixed up with the God of religion and the God of reason, you are into irrationality.
I am not into propounding the God of religion, an example of which is God in the Bible.
Here is my reasoning on establishing the existence of the God of reason, which in concept for me is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
Yesterday I contributed (see quote below) this line of reasoning in the website of an ex-atheist, he knows the distinction between God of reason and God of religion.
What I want you to do is to tell me where I am not into rational discourse with my reasoning on God exists, in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
So, it is not enough that you just declare that you deny God's existence whether of reason or of religion.
You owe it to your membership in the club of homo sapiens,* to tell me what is your reasoning on which you ground your declaration against God's existence altogether.
*homo sapiens = in Latin, live entity with intelligence, the Latin word homo means a human being, and for your curiosity homo is also a Greek word (in its own Greek writing, but both are transcribed in English alphabet by the letters h o m o; take notice that homo in Greek means similar, like as in homosexual.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 9K
-
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 7K
-
Facebook
Twitter