• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What hasn't ATI produced a dual DVI Radeon 9800?

It is certainly possible, once sufficient demand exists.

In fact, if at least one of your LCDs is analog, you're there.
 
One could assume that two DVI connectors and the usual DVI to VGA adapter could be included with the only downside being that dual-VGA users would have to purchase an additional adapter. However, juding by some 8500's that were supplied with VGA and DVI where the latter was digital-only and the board visibly lacked a chip that on other models made the DVI analog capable, I reckon it is definitely a cost issue. If that omission was worth it then imagine the if every card manufactured would then require a more complicated design and additional parts over a standard one, regardless of how it was to be used (like the typical single VGA).
 
Not enough demand for such a product, plus as lot of LCD's have VGA in as well.

Their workstation products have dual DVI though, IICR.
 
Yes, some of the FireGL cards have dual DVI. Few average-joe consumers have dual DVI-capable LCDs, so it doesn't make sense to put them into anything but a very high-end part.

I also believe the reference design for the 9800-series cards only has one chip capable of doing digital output. The 9800SE, 9800NP, and 9800Pro are all essentially the same card (albeit with slower memory and/or lower clocks on the cheaper models). You'd have to come up with a new PCB design for a dual-DVI card, which would be costly. Some manufacturers said they would, but they ended up not doing it, probably due to high cost and perceived lack of a market. You'd have to sell the card for more to make up the difference, and then you'd be at a disadvantage against the other cards in terms of everyone that *doesn't* have dual DVI LCDs (ie, 99% of the market). Even people who already have one DVI LCD are probably unlikely to buy a more expensive card on the off chance that they'll add a second LCD at some point in the future, especially when they're just as likely to need a whole new video card by then anyway.
 
Back
Top