What happens to the fallout if a nuclear missle is intercepted?

Saint Nick

Lifer
Jan 21, 2005
17,722
6
81
Say a nuclear missile is intercepted between Asia and Hawaii. What happens to the fallout? Does it go into the atmosphere or does it stick around down here and fly around in the jet stream?
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,658
33,499
136
An intercepted warhead is unlikely to denonate as a nuclear explosion. An interception might ignite the warhead in a conventional explosion/fire spreading plutonium and uranium ash. It will likely rain down on the southern hemisphere where no one important lives anyway.


How long and how far ash might spread depends on particle size and is very difficult to estimate. Finer ash = longer time in the atmosphere and farther travel distance.
 

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,408
10
0
Lay off the news.

Whatever happens happens, it's out of your control/don't worry about it.

Don't let our fucked up media possess you with fear....

PS. also chances of a missle interseptions are VERY slim. US has tried for years and many test were failures (but they do a great job to assure public they can shut down anything in the sky). Think about it, they are telling you they can shut down a bullet that's going hundreds/if not thousands of miles an hour from the sky (with another bullet). Chances are slim (but I'm sure it's possible).

Most missile defense systems are just another way to extract money from public > corporations.
 
Last edited:

Agent11

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2006
3,535
1
0
They don't explode when shot down, so there wouldn't be 'fallout' in that sense. There would be radioactive debris but not so bad I would be overly concerned about it.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,574
972
126
We've detonated over a hundred of these devices in the south Pacific in the 1940s and 50s.
 

dougp

Diamond Member
May 3, 2002
7,909
4
0
Lay off the news.

Whatever happens happens, it's out of your control/don't worry about it.

Don't let our fucked up media possess you with fear....

PS. also chances of a missle interseptions are VERY slim. US has tried for years and many test were failures (but they do a great job to assure public they can shut down anything in the sky). Think about it, they are telling you they can shut down a bullet that's going hundreds/if not thousands of miles an hour from the sky (with another bullet). Chances are slim (but I'm sure it's possible).

Most missile defense systems are just another way to extract money from public > corporations.

Patriots are fairly accurate, but there's a reason why the US was looking at using nuclear anti-missile systems - it's easier to blanket an area with the suspected path as opposed to trying to hit it head on.
 

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,408
10
0
Patriots are fairly accurate, but there's a reason why the US was looking at using nuclear anti-missile systems - it's easier to blanket an area with the suspected path as opposed to trying to hit it head on.

Correct, but suspected path = whole bunch of assumptions.

US is and never was prepared for ANY missile attack. Don't fool yourself. Do we have things that MIGHT help, sure. But they cost our children/grand children BILLIONS and are still "maybe"/chances are low.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,448
13,746
126
www.anyf.ca
I think it just vanishes, and the other person on the other end just gets a message that says DENIED. At least that's what happens in UT3 with the redeemer. :biggrin:
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,847
17,767
126
Say a nuclear missile is intercepted between Asia and Hawaii. What happens to the fallout? Does it go into the atmosphere or does it stick around down here and fly around in the jet stream?

No fallout, you just need to recover the radio isotope fragments. And clean up what ever environental contamination.
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
6,357
2,561
136
Lay off the news.

Whatever happens happens, it's out of your control/don't worry about it.

Don't let our fucked up media possess you with fear....

PS. also chances of a missle interseptions are VERY slim. US has tried for years and many test were failures (but they do a great job to assure public they can shut down anything in the sky). Think about it, they are telling you they can shut down a bullet that's going hundreds/if not thousands of miles an hour from the sky (with another bullet). Chances are slim (but I'm sure it's possible).

Most missile defense systems are just another way to extract money from public > corporations.

It isn't difficult with computers to predict the path of the object across the sky and then just place another object in the same path.
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
6,357
2,561
136
Say a nuclear missile is intercepted between Asia and Hawaii. What happens to the fallout? Does it go into the atmosphere or does it stick around down here and fly around in the jet stream?

The nuclear warhead doesn't initiate so you just have some possible radioactive debris that could make it's way back down to the ground. A lot better than having the warhead initiate a detonation over a US city.
 

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,408
10
0
It isn't difficult with computers to predict the path of the object across the sky and then just place another object in the same path.

Translation: it's not difficult to shot a bullet out of the sky

It's VERY difficult. Matter a fact it's so difficult that such technology has never really been very successful.

BUT plenty of money has been pulled from American public during Cold War and NOW for such "failed projects".

American's don't seem to mind. It gives us that sense of security. Our politicians and corporations know VERY well that there is a HUGE market for that.

;)
 
Last edited:

Rakehellion

Lifer
Jan 15, 2013
12,181
35
91
It isn't difficult with computers to predict the path of the object across the sky and then just place another object in the same path.

Yes, the object follows a fairly predictable trajectory and takes several minutes to land, but it's very tiny, very turbulent, and to effectively disable it you have to hit it from the side.

Not to mention they could launch dozens of these things at once.
 

Anonemous

Diamond Member
May 19, 2003
7,361
1
71
C0wfJlj.jpg


4LXUqmH.jpg


hehe iMac
1E5AXVQ.jpg
 

Eureka

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
3,822
1
81
http://i.imgur.com/C0wfJlj.jpg[img]

[img]http://i.imgur.com/4LXUqmH.jpg[img]

hehe iMac
[img]http://i.imgur.com/1E5AXVQ.jpg[img][/QUOTE]

Congrats, I saw that on Reddit too. :D

I wouldn't entrust millions of lives to the Patriot system. It's OK as a last-resort defense system after all else fails, but the best safeguard is to prevent them from launching missiles in the first place. Plus it can only intercept at lower altitudes, not the higher altitudes that a good ICBM flies at (hundreds or thousands of miles above sea level).
 
Last edited:

Rakehellion

Lifer
Jan 15, 2013
12,181
35
91
I wonder if Obama will defy every peace treaty like Bush and nuke North Korea if it comes down to it. We all know black presidents have bigger wangs than white presidents. Except Clinton.
 

Anonemous

Diamond Member
May 19, 2003
7,361
1
71
Congrats, I saw that on Reddit too. :D

I wouldn't entrust millions of lives to the Patriot system. It's OK as a last-resort defense system after all else fails, but the best safeguard is to prevent them from launching missiles in the first place. Plus it can only intercept at lower altitudes, not the higher altitudes that a good ICBM flies at (hundreds or thousands of miles above sea level).

Yep, just wanted people to know NK has a strike plan for both West and East Coast. :) Whether or not they can carry out this plan is another story...
 

Eureka

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
3,822
1
81
Yep, just wanted people to know NK has a strike plan for both West and East Coast. :) Whether or not they can carry out this plan is another story...

You didn't read the thread, did you? That's not a strike plan. That's propaganda. It's like looking on a map and saying, I'm going to hit New York.

A strike plan would actually have missile trajectories and force movements. Those aren't trajectories. They're straight lines on a map. Which, BTW, is not how flying vehicles work.
 

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,408
10
0
I wonder if Obama will defy every peace treaty like Bush and nuke North Korea if it comes down to it. We all know black presidents have bigger wangs than white presidents. Except Clinton.

I'm pretty sure he won't get into "dick waving " match with an Asian man.

:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:

I just don't see that happening hehe
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
Lay off the news.

Whatever happens happens, it's out of your control/don't worry about it.

Don't let our fucked up media possess you with fear....

PS. also chances of a missle interseptions are VERY slim. US has tried for years and many test were failures (but they do a great job to assure public they can shut down anything in the sky). Think about it, they are telling you they can shut down a bullet that's going hundreds/if not thousands of miles an hour from the sky (with another bullet). Chances are slim (but I'm sure it's possible).

Most missile defense systems are just another way to extract money from public > corporations.

Best Korea doesn't have a missile that can reach the US. Japan and S. Korea should be the ones getting nervous.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,731
3,440
136
The missile doesn't get destroyed completely, it gets broken or disturbed in it's flight path and will probably just crash or fall in the ocean and leak radiation, killing all of the fish for hundreds of miles around. Not a big deal.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
PS. also chances of a missle interseptions are VERY slim. US has tried for years and many test were failures (but they do a great job to assure public they can shut down anything in the sky). Think about it, they are telling you they can shut down a bullet that's going hundreds/if not thousands of miles an hour from the sky (with another bullet). Chances are slim (but I'm sure it's possible).

Most missile defense systems are just another way to extract money from public > corporations.

So, shall I assume that you have a lot of experience in missile defense or that you're just talking out of your derriere? :p

EDIT:

An intercepted warhead is unlikely to denonate as a nuclear explosion.

Pretty much. I don't think most people understand how even the most basic of nuclear weapons function, and they'll actually believe malarkey like this. It isn't hard to explain that you actually have to start a nuclear chain reaction. :p
 
Last edited: