0 - worst, 1 - bad, 2 - good, 3 - horrible
That is your argument?
And by the way, you stopped using ratios and switched to totals, so if your going to accuse me of being stupid because I don't understand ratios, make sure you are actually discussing ratios. Ratio would be .5 parents to each child ( my family) compared to 1.1 parent to child, the hypothetical 10 children, 10 mothers, 1 father family. Which would put your hypothetical polygamist family much closer to your preferred ratios than my family was at.
You have also failed to present any science at all supporting your position. There are peer-reviewed journals why don't you go look through them. If you want to claim we don't understand science, find me some actual science to support your argument, because I don't know of any actual studies done on this.
The parental argument is not even in a question here. Gay couples are allowed to adopt children, or have children. There is no question there. Whether they are married or not is irrelevant to child bearing.
I can absolutely see the logic fail in YOU that you, naturally, presumed that the sex of the Father was the operative descriptor here.
Here it is for your puny mind:
1 Father
10 Mothers
10 Children
Instead of 2 parents per child, you have 1.1 parents. This gets worse when the mothers have more than 1 child (and obviously, applies to 2 parent families with lots of children as well), but you can clearly see how the problem gets compounded.
Correct. And Wrong. Because of the above. And your own ignorance. And stupidity. :awe:
Are you stupid?
Parent to child ratio is the most basic indicator of a strong family.
Let's see 0 parents - Worst
Divorced Single Parent or dead parent - Pretty bad
2 Parents - Good
For a standard 2 parent - 1 child family, you would need 20 parents for 10 children.
That's 10 Fathers and 10 Mothers.
This will NEVER happen. NEVER.
The standard polygamy will consist of 1 father and 5-10 mothers.
The fathers are shared, the mothers are NOT (for obvious reasons - only one of them is actually your mother).
This ranges from a 1.2:1 - 1.1:1 range of parents to children ratio, assuming one child.
In a one child scenario for a standard 2 parent model is 2:1 ratio.
For 2 children per mother, the ratios deteriorate exponentially.
That's 0.6:1 to 0.55:1 ratio for the standard polygamy of 1 father and 5-10 mothers with two children each.
The same ratio in a 2 parent model is a 1:1 ratio.
For a comparable number of children, the standard 2 parent model is always on the order of one magnitude better than the 1 father and 5 mothers polygamy. This should have been obvious given that the Father is always split up and the mothers would naturally direct their primary attention to their own biological children.
Also, do not for one moment forget that this is only 1 of the weakest arguments against polygamy (that is still valid) while there exist many other insurmountable ones.
I only chose to address this one further because people picked this one (for being such fucking dumbasses) to question.
Fat chicks need lovin too!
I have yet to hear a counter-argument to the one I've posted in other threads on gay marriage:
(condensed form: ) While traditional marriage has benefits to society in terms of procreation and child rearing, gay marriage has benefits to society too; benefits worth government recognition and advocation.
I'm drawing a blank here on the societal benefits of gay civil unions...what did you think they were again (I honestly want to know, because I can't really think of any).
Chuck
I have yet to hear a counter-argument to the one I've posted in other threads on gay marriage:
(condensed form: ) While traditional marriage has benefits to society in terms of procreation and child rearing, gay marriage has benefits to society too; benefits worth government recognition and advocation.
What benefits are you talking about? As in comparison to what actually?
If you can't see the benefits then you're missing the whole point of life, and I'm not even going to explain that to you.
As a side note, I'd like to hear your "valid" arguments why same-sex marriage wont benefit society. If you can convince me that I don't deserve to be treated equally as you, then I'll ring up one of those "conversion" centres and convert to being straight.
And also just to put you in your place Classy, regardless if I am gay, I can "act" a straight lifestyle, and I am a white male which will always benefit me better in society then you. If you want to blindly discriminate against me based on my sexuality, then I can do the same to you.
Here's an argument just about equal and on the same level as your arguments against same-sex marriage.....Black people are not fit to be parents. Why? Have you not seen the movie Precious?
If you can't see the benefits then you're missing the whole point of life, and I'm not even going to explain that to you.
As a side note, I'd like to hear your "valid" arguments why same-sex marriage wont benefit society. If you can convince me that I don't deserve to be treated equally as you, then I'll ring up one of those "conversion" centres and convert to being straight.
And also just to put you in your place Classy, regardless if I am gay, I can "act" a straight lifestyle, and I am a white male which will always benefit me better in society then you. If you want to blindly discriminate against me based on my sexuality, then I can do the same to you.
Here's an argument just about equal and on the same level as your arguments against same-sex marriage.....Black people are not fit to be parents. Why? Have you not seen the movie Precious?
And your post has proved my point that race and being a Homo-sexual is not the same.
Classy your argument was all based on opinion and stereotypes. That's like me saying black people are unfit to be parents because of the high rate of crimes committed, drug use, violence within the black community.
Or to take it down to your level, big lipped knuckle dragging apes shouldn't be parents because they're neanderthals. Having black people as parents are just going to confuse children what with them teaching them how to be all black and shit. Baby will probably be born with a crack pipe in its mouth and be confused when it graduates to heroin.
Get a fucking clue. You worldview is slowly becoming the minority, hopefully your children wont pick up your bigotry.
Get a fucking clue. You worldview is slowly becoming the minority, hopefully your children wont pick up your bigotry.
Classy your argument was all based on opinion and stereotypes.
Nobody becomes so rabidly homophobic without carrying the gay gene. The gay gene's dominant allele is the gene for self hate and hypocrisy. Chances are good at least one of his children will be gay.
Nah not possible. One is a full grown woman who I know without question is not gay. And the little one has already got the glassy eyed look when she sees a cute boy. Nah no nastyness here. Good ole fashioned kids that have been "Raised Right", lol. And Moonie its not about the bible. I am a true Alpha male and I don't have no sympathy for sissys.
True alpha males mount their competition. Consider yourself mounted.
Sorry classy, I'm not into black dudes, I don't think races should mix. it's bad for society and we don't want kids of mixed race it will just confuse them.
I am a true Alpha male and I don't have no sympathy for sissys.
LOL
There is 0 benefit to gay marriage except for the participates.
It offers nothing to society, completely empty.
It offers confusion for the children
and poor examples of what a man and woman should be.
