LOL but delay is certainly a possibility. But folks who're longing for quad-cores just for the sake of them (i.e. no multi-tasking, encoding, or virtual PC, etc.) could be disappointed. E6600 @3.60GHz feels a lot snappier than Q6600 @3.20GHz for most of the task (for me). I'm only keeping the Q6600 for Virtualization. (which in itself is still immature as far as hardware acceleration is concerned) Extra 20~30C of temps are an icing on the cake.Originally posted by: n7
On the 22nd, Intel will announce they've canceled plans for price cuts, stating more than adequate sales w/o them.![]()
Originally posted by: lopri
LOL but delay is certainly a possibility. But folks who're longing for quad-cores just for the sake of them (i.e. no multi-tasking, encoding, or virtual PC, etc.) could be disappointed. E6600 @3.60GHz feels a lot snappier than Q6600 @3.20GHz for most of the task (for me). I'm only keeping the Q6600 for Virtualization. (which in itself is still immature as far as hardware acceleration is concerned) Extra 20~30C of temps are an icing on the cake.Originally posted by: n7
On the 22nd, Intel will announce they've canceled plans for price cuts, stating more than adequate sales w/o them.![]()
For the determined, I'd suggest to make a purchase as soon as the price drops. As the demand goes up, Intel will really be binning the chips. If your workload doesn't guarantee the need of a quad, waiting till Penryn hits isn't a terrible idea, IMO.
Originally posted by: Skott
The E6600 is a really good chip so people may snap them up while they can. It'll also depend on how good of a chip its replacement is too.
Originally posted by: Skott
Hard to say how low the E6600/E6700 prices drop. The E6600 is to be discontinued so demand/supply will determine it. The E6600 is a really good chip so people may snap them up while they can. It'll also depend on how good of a chip its replacement is too.