What dot pitch is good for 1600x1200?

Muerto

Golden Member
Dec 26, 1999
1,937
0
0
I saw a 19" KDS monitor (can't remember which one) for sale at a local store for $384 CDN. (about $256 US). It can do 1600x1200 but the DP is only 0.27 mm. Is that good enough for that high of a resolution or should I go with a 0.25 DP monitor? Thanks. :)

NOTE: I think it may have been this one. I'll have to go back and check.
KDS VS-190
 

Atomicpower

Banned
Sep 30, 2000
56
0
0
Should be bigger than that! But it's still acceptable. Get the one with .25 if there is no big price difference!
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
10
81
Usually, bigger = more. More, in this case, is bad. The smaller the dot pitch the better.

It was probably a Visual Sensations monitor, right? Can't say I've ever heard of user comments, but the line is probably economy. NFS4 has a VS monitor.
 

Madcowz

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2000
2,652
0
0
In most cases you won't be using the 1600*1200 resolutions anyways... not in games nor in desktop environment. I have a 21" Trinitron and would have eye problems from squinting too much if I keep it in 1600*1200... anyways try getting a monitor w/ at least .26 DP... don't skimp out when your getting a monitor b/c those are big investments; you'll probably end up having it for about 2-4 years so make it a good choice
 

HD2GO

Senior member
Nov 2, 1999
351
0
0

Try a 0.22 Sony. Can't beat that. But, it's unlikely that you will use 1600x1200 for normal use. That resolution is more useful for Photoshop or CAD work.
 

Muerto

Golden Member
Dec 26, 1999
1,937
0
0
Thanks for the input guys. I'm an engineering student so I will be doing a lot of CAD work (forgot to mention that, sorry). Everything else will just be games, surfing the web, and hanging out here. :)
 

Redwingsguy

Diamond Member
Jan 6, 2000
3,967
0
0
Hey I use 1600*1200 on the same moniter Paulson has regularly and I dont have a problem with it!
 

Noriaki

Lifer
Jun 3, 2000
13,640
1
71
I woudln't want .27dp in 1600x1200 on a 19"

I'd want .25 tops. Try and get lower if you can.

If you use 1600x1200 with .27dp for any significant length of time you'll be sorry I think.

Oh and make sure it's at least 70Hz; 75, 80 or 85 would be even better.
You want to make sure it's well above what the human eye can percieve so you don't notice flickering. Even if it's right on the borderline of perception, it can cause headaches and stuff without you really knowing it's flickering.
 

pRick

Junior Member
Oct 1, 2000
7
0
0
The ABSOLUTE MINIMUM setup you should shoot for is .25 dot pitch, 75Hz @ 1600x1200.

Trust me on that. There's nothing worse than a blurry image. Don't get a cheap 19" montior for CAD. The bigger the monitor, the more surface warping happens. Get a screen as FLAT as possible, otherwise you are going to be one unhappy individual. :(
 

Muerto

Golden Member
Dec 26, 1999
1,937
0
0
Thanks again people! I will definitely be buying a .25 monitor. I didn't think .27 would be good enough but I just wanted to be sure. I'm now looking at the KDS AV-195TF

It looks pretty sweet! :)
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
you guys are kinda of confused. .27 dpi on a 19" or 21" monitor is prefectly acceptable, since its a large monitor. The VS line is a great monitor for the price. I've got a kds-vs19sn myself (panasonic tube) and it cost $274 and was awesome. the best deal i've seen was the vs-190 a couple weeks back, it was $160 after rebates and coupons at buy.com. That is a samsung or hitachi tube as kds doesnt make their own tubes. Very good monitors, much cheaper than that overpriced sony crap. Also that is a .27 diagonal pitch, which is about equivalent to a .24 stripe pitch (i.e. a .24 trinitron like a $650 sony g400). The vs19sn has a .26 diagonal and is also real good. the sharpest i'd say is the samsung ift series with is .2 horizontal which is about .25 diagonal. Make sure you get a good video card for non blurriness , some nvidia cards are real bad some are good so it might not be just your monitor