<<
<<
<< keep in mind, you won't be impressed =D >>
And just why not? VIVO sounds like a good idea for me... is it somehow inadequate? Elaborate... >>
Well vivo captures tv @ 480x400, while tv displays at 640x480, so the video will be stretched
>>
Wrong. I have the Radeon 64 VIVO. With the latest drivers, I can capture at 720x480, which is what TV
really works at. The drivers come with several pre-configured capture-quality settings. Some of them include:
Full Resolution: 720x480, 8.00 Mb/s, 44.100KHz, 16 bit stereo.
VGA Resolution: 640x480, 6.00 Mb/s, 44.1KHz, 16 bit stereo.
VideoCD: 352x240, 1.05Mb/s, 44.100KHz, 16bit stereo. Saved directly to mpeg1.
DVD High: Same as "Full Resolution" saved directly to mpeg2.
The latest drivers support saving directly to several formats, including mpeg1, mpeg2, AVI, and Windows Media. The Windows Media format is nice because it lets me save a TV show and put it on a web site or directly copy it to my Pocket PC for later watching. They also have a Motion Triggered setting that will capture either stills or time-lapse based on changes in the video. Excellent for a low-budget surveillance setup.
I have an old WebTV box hooked up as my TV tuner source. It could just as easily be a VCR or video camera. Most of the time with my card, I use the video-in to just have the TV playing while I'm web-surfing. Sure it's not a top-quality video capture card for quality video editing, but for a multi-purpose device it's quite nice. The only thing I don't like about it is the lack of a built-in TV tuner. That's the All-In-Wonder series obviously, but the AIW have historically sacrificed gaming performance.