-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
What does God need with a starship?
- Thread starter NoReMoRsE
- Start date
GagHalfrunt
Lifer
So he doesn't have to fly commercial.
NikolaeVarius
Lifer
So he can bring the marklar to the marklar of marklar to teach them about the marklar
SsupernovaE
Golden Member
Share your pain!
imported_Imp
Diamond Member
It started good, ended good too. Just the middle that's a bit boring.
dennilfloss
Past Lifer 1957-2014 In Memoriam
dennil does a fan dance...
ShotgunSteven
Lifer
So he can nuke them from orbit.
Huh? No idea what you're talking about. Good beginning, decent middle, horrible ending. To be fair, the script originally called for more action (fight with big Rock golems, IIRC), but the budget didn't allow for it.
OTOH, how many people get to shoot God in the face? :evil:
Fritzo
Lifer
He needed it to try to get away from Shatner's crappy movie.
It' didn't work.
1989 Worst Movie:
Star Trek V
1989 Worst Actor in a Motion Picture:
William Shatner
1989 Worst Special Effects in a Motion Picture:
Star Trek V
He got a trifecta!!!!
Let's go over some of the pain from this movie:
1) Special effects that looked like they were from the 1960's
2) Urura in her 50's doing a naked fan dance---BLECH!!!!!!
3) Spock's brother having the ability to show scenes from people's lives magically...wtf?
4) The Enterprise is able to get from Earth to the center of the galaxy in a day or two, yet they spent 5 years cruising around the middle part during the TV show and still didn't make it to the center.
5) The whole Scott/Uhura love thingy was just plain creepy.
On the positive side, the comedy portions of the movie were actually pretty funny. There were just too many of them. It seemed like entire scenes were added to just make a joke. Star Trek VI made up for it though.
It' didn't work.
1989 Worst Movie:
Star Trek V
1989 Worst Actor in a Motion Picture:
William Shatner
1989 Worst Special Effects in a Motion Picture:
Star Trek V
He got a trifecta!!!!
Let's go over some of the pain from this movie:
1) Special effects that looked like they were from the 1960's
2) Urura in her 50's doing a naked fan dance---BLECH!!!!!!
3) Spock's brother having the ability to show scenes from people's lives magically...wtf?
4) The Enterprise is able to get from Earth to the center of the galaxy in a day or two, yet they spent 5 years cruising around the middle part during the TV show and still didn't make it to the center.
5) The whole Scott/Uhura love thingy was just plain creepy.
On the positive side, the comedy portions of the movie were actually pretty funny. There were just too many of them. It seemed like entire scenes were added to just make a joke. Star Trek VI made up for it though.
JulesMaximus
No Lifer
This.
That movie blows chunks. It is almost completely unwatchable.
Evadman
Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Function IsItAGoodStarTrekMovie(Num as int) as boolean
On Error Goto BadMath
IF NUM <1 then goto BadMath
IF Num MOD 2 = 1 THEN
IsItAGoodStarTrekMovie = FALSE
ELSE
IsItAGoodStarTrekMovie = TRUE
END IF
EXIT Function
BadMath:
msgbox "That is not a valid number you doof."
End Function
On Error Goto BadMath
IF NUM <1 then goto BadMath
IF Num MOD 2 = 1 THEN
IsItAGoodStarTrekMovie = FALSE
ELSE
IsItAGoodStarTrekMovie = TRUE
END IF
EXIT Function
BadMath:
msgbox "That is not a valid number you doof."
End Function
JeffreyLebowski
Lifer
STV as awhole wasn't very good, but it had some great parts. The beginning with Kirk, Spock and McCoy was cool, and had some of the best character interactions in the series.