Originally posted by: Bacstar
... almost like choosing a good woman

...
What you mean,
almost???
I know what you mean about a real piano vs. an electronic keyboard, but there's those nagging issues of gravity and inertia. We don't get paid for playing. We'd do that, anyhow. We actually get paid for setting up, tearing down and moving all that mass. ;cool;
I also had a Hammond A-100, which is the same as a C3, except it also has built in speakers and a power amp. A C3 is the same as a B3 with sold sides instead of the spindle legs.
I never got the one acceessory I really needed -- Roadies.
BTW --
Here's the kewlest keyboard amp in existence. There's an explanation of how it works,
here. The site belongs to a friend of mine who's the co-inventor of the system.
I own one, and I wouldn't use anything else for live performances.
It's essentially the inverse of M-S miking, if you know what is. When recording, you use a cardioid mic for your center channel information (L + R) and a figure eight mic pointed side to side across the sound field to get "difference" information (L - R). Then, you sum and difference them in an electronic matrix to derive L and R channel information.
The advantages are that you always get a good center channel and you get a lot of extra cue information that presents a beautiful, spacious sonic image.
This speaker system does the inverse. It uses a front firing center channel speaker and another speaker aimed sideways and open on both sides to produce difference information. The system takes your stereo keyboard signal, runs it through the same kind of electronic matrix to derive sum and difference signals and feed them to the appropriate speakers.
This box won't produce hard left - right images, but it creates a beautifully spacious image that works anywhere in the listening room, instead of a "sweet spot" in a limited listening area. It's the perfect setup for a good stereo Lesile emulation. :music:

:music: