I'm another user that tried Nero first then tried EZCD5.
I preferred the interface of EZ CD5, combined with the very easy learning curve and never looked back
I have been using EZ CD5 since getting my first "burner" in March/April 2001 and have no complaints with it so far either.
However, I know that the "same" software does vary for some people and can have disastrous effects on some systems. Take Windows ME for example - best OS from Micro$oft that I have ever used. I think I only ever had one bluescreen and that was due to my CDR jumpers being on the incorrect setting (master/slave etc).
However, I have a friend who is using Windows ME and he had endless trouble with it and reverted to Windows 98.
I'm not sure if that has something to do with his system being Intel based or not - but my two systems below run perfectly with ME and EZ CD5
