J-Money
Senior member
- Feb 9, 2003
- 552
- 0
- 0
Maybe Canadians should be required to pay the US for their protection
Maybe. But first someone in the world needs a reason to be mad at us for something.
Maybe Canadians should be required to pay the US for their protection
Yes they are bad, but at least the drop outs WENT to school unlike the rednecks.
spike tv
EDIT: and Cops
What do democrats do in an election when their man/woman doesn't win? Fail thread is fail.
I don't see that happening in the near future...![]()
Guaranteed in 4 years we will see a cast of clowns vying to be the Presidential nominee of the Democratic party.
Guaranteed in 4 years we will see a cast of clowns vying to be the Presidential nominee of the Democratic party.
Exactly.
What did the Democrats do when they suffered perhaps the most embarrassing election loss in history? Yes, I'm referring to Kerry losing to Bush in 2004. From what I recall, we saw lip-biting, hand-wringing, insults directed at the American people, and all sorts of fun excuses.
LOL You mean worst then the clown show we are witnessing on the GOP side? LMFAO.
Exactly.
What did the Democrats do when they suffered perhaps the most embarrassing election loss in history? Yes, I'm referring to Kerry losing to Bush in 2004. From what I recall, we saw lip-biting, hand-wringing, insults directed at the American people, and all sorts of fun excuses.
That wasn't a loss...that was a robbery.
We will get to see not only one cast of clowns but two in 2015.
pretty much. this question is retarded.What do democrats do in an election when their man/woman doesn't win? Fail thread is fail.
How so?
Both the Republican and Democratic parties will have clowns vying for the Presidential nominee for the respective parties.
assuming Obama wins, both Democrats and Republicans will have a slew of clowns vying for office in their respective primaries in 4 years.That's an assumption.
assuming Obama wins, both Democrats and Republicans will have a slew of clowns vying for office in their respective primaries in 4 years.
it happened 4 years ago, it's not terribly hard to look back at how it worked. most people stayed with their party even if their guy or girl didn't win the nomination.
That wasn't a loss...that was a robbery.
Exhibit A. Thanks for proving my point.
Of all things to try to bash Democrats for, intelligence isn't probably the best approach as a Republican.
It's clear to everyone who isn't biased that the majority of the dumbfucks in your country vote Republican (rednecks).
The worst you get voting Democrat is hippies. And while stoned out of their minds, they aren't inbred at least.
Best thing to get them for is bathing.
Proving what point?
So when your man or woman doesn't win that you had high hopes for...
Be it Perry, Romney, Ron Paul, etc...etc...
Well, the First things republican do is cry, then they read the bible again... So, now what???????
Do you vote for Obama? Or third party? Or do you just keep the axe to the stone and vote in your party ranks even tho your man didn't win?
Just find it kinda funny...
Pro tip, just because they call it reality TV, doesn't make it reality.
Reread what MotF Bane posted -- in particular, the bolded portion.
The only "robbery" in the 2004 election was the fact that the American people were robbed of having decent candidates to choose from rather than the 2 morons who were selected by their parties.
