What do you use for graphics - LCD or CRT?

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
49,738
6,101
136
I'm looking into buying a new monitor in the next year. I currently have a 17" CRT with really bad black levels (dark purple and blue look black) and flicker. I work for long periods of time on different projects using my computer, ranging from homework to using Microsoft Office and Adobe InDesign for publishing projects (ie lots of text) to Paint Shop Pro, Photoshop, Illustrator, Rhino 3D, TrueSpace, and other 2D/3D software packages for graphics projects. I also do a bit of home video for fun, some programming, and occasionally computer games like Half-Life. I'm not a hardcore gamer, however, so a lower response time like 25ms on an LCD wouldn't bother me too much.

So, I'm debating what kind of monitor to get. I know I want something in the 20 - 22" range. I'm willing to save up for it for awhile, because I'll be using it nearly every day for hours at a time. In my opinion, LCDs still aren't as good as CRTs for graphics work, but the newer models may be better, I don't know. However, I've heard that LCDs reduce eye strain and stuff, because there's a lower refresh rate - supposedly they're much easier on the eyes than CRTs. That sounds good! I know that LCDs save space, but I have a basic rectangle desk, so a 22" CRT is not a problem - I have space to work with.

One issue I have with LCDs is the native resolution. I don't like tiny type. I've seen some bigger LCD monitors that have horribly tiny buttons and text, and I don't care for that. My old laptop's screen would look funky if I resized the resolution different that it's native setting...so is that still applicable with today's LCDs? I've heard that Windows XP has a feature where you can change the DPI for LCD screens so that the text and stuff looks bigger....any ideas about that?

I want to invest in a good, big monitor. There are two that I'm looking at:
LaCie Electron Blue 22" CRT
Dell 2001FP 20.1" LCD

The LaCie costs about $700 and the Dell costs about $800. I'm willing to save up for either one, or a different one if you have a better suggestion. The LaCie CRT is supposed to be a fantastic monitor for graphics work, but I still worry about refresh rates and flicker and staring at a monitor for sometimes 14 hours while working on a long project. The Dell LCD is popular and I've read a lot of great reviews about it, but I haven't seen it in person (or the LaCie, for that matter). What would you get if you were in my situation? An LCD or a CRT? The LaCie or the Dell? Or maybe a completely different monitor? I'd like to spend less than $1,000, by the way.

Thoughts and comments appreciated!
 

wfbberzerker

Lifer
Apr 12, 2001
10,423
0
0
i'd say you want to get an lcd. they're much better on the eyes if youre working for very long periods of time.
 

DrMindbender

Member
May 26, 2004
143
0
0
I'd go with the Dell. It sounds like you handle text and layouts and a smidgen of everything else. This monitor should have a fast response time for the occasional game. If you were doing professional photo/graphics work on solely images more than half the time, I'd go with a crt. Video maybe too, but I've been to a post-production facility in LA and they used dual LCD widescreen monitors.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
49,738
6,101
136
Yeah, I'm kind of leaning towards the Dell right now. Anyone have a 2001FP and care to comment? I'd like to know if the text and Windows buttons are really small or not...
 

wfbberzerker

Lifer
Apr 12, 2001
10,423
0
0
the dell has a max resolution of 1600x1200, and on my 19" crt, the buttons/text look fine at 16x12. so, considering the dell lcd is much bigger than that, you shouldn't have any problems with buttons and text being to small.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,810
126
2001FP is 1600x1200 at 20". I think that's perfect resolution for that size. Everything is crystal clear, sharp, and bright. I've no problem with text size or graphic quality. I run dual monitor with 20" Dell 2001FP and 21" Sony G520P and if I had to choose only one, I would choose 2001FP without question. G520P CRT does have advantage in games and color so if you're heavy gamer or hardcore graphic artist you should probably stick with CRT. But it sounds like you're not either so I would go with LCD like Dell 2001FP or Samsung 213T in your case.

By next year, prices on these 20" LCD should have come down significantly. I wouldn't be surprised to see these go for $500-600 next year.
 

Zucarita9000

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,590
0
0
You may want to consider the new 20" Cinema from Apple. They come with native DVI interface, and they'll work just fine on a PC. Apple LCDs are some of the best LCDs available. They're more expensive, but they look so cool.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
49,738
6,101
136
problem solved! someone at my dad's work posted a nice CRT for sale. ended up being a Dell Trinitron Ultra Scan P 1110 CRT, 21", dual video inputs, in great condition with a vga cable and power cord for $100. I really lucked out on this...now I don't feel so bad about spending $300 on books next semester :) I picked it up tonight...looks awesome.

I think I will upgrade to an LCD eventually, but for now, this CRT is more than great. I'll either upgrade to a 2001FP or an Apple display if I have the green. thanks for all your input!
 

Artofkicking

Junior Member
Aug 14, 2004
11
0
0
Bottom line for me is I love the look of high frame rates when gaming using a crt. If I ever quit gaming so much I would definetely go lcd. Also, price vs. screen size is something to consider if the budgets a bit tight.