why cant we have a less activist Fed chairman like P Volcker (or better yet, Jim Rogers) who doesnt loan to every single bank, especially those that are wreckless and those that pay their management more than 10x what they pay their tellers and those that operate on low reserves?
Was the recession of 1981 really the end of the world? Wasnt it a lot less bad than the recession of 08 when rates were reduced to near zero in addition to the banks getting bailed out via taxes?
why do ALL banks have to be loaned to and ALL at the same fuckin super duper low interest rates?
how would it have been any worse if underwater home-owners had been bailed out and if the largest banks had been allowed to fail?
i mean, why dont we have a central pantry for small restaurants so they dont fail?
anyway, i am mad as hell that the banksters get their way 100% of the time and that so many people are like "they may be assholes, but they can and will take the economy down with them" (even though they actually cant do anything that lasts forever and even though there were and always are options other than fascism).
Was the recession of 1981 really the end of the world? Wasnt it a lot less bad than the recession of 08 when rates were reduced to near zero in addition to the banks getting bailed out via taxes?
why do ALL banks have to be loaned to and ALL at the same fuckin super duper low interest rates?
how would it have been any worse if underwater home-owners had been bailed out and if the largest banks had been allowed to fail?
i mean, why dont we have a central pantry for small restaurants so they dont fail?
anyway, i am mad as hell that the banksters get their way 100% of the time and that so many people are like "they may be assholes, but they can and will take the economy down with them" (even though they actually cant do anything that lasts forever and even though there were and always are options other than fascism).
