- Jul 7, 2008
- 5,558
- 25
- 91
I'll keep this short: I've been wondering if my AMD 785G motherboard is less than ideal for playing video games and doing other intensive tasks. I hear people talking about their gaming setups that have an 890FX for crossfire and whatnot, and I don't know if they have any huge improvements for single-card setups.
If I had chosen an 8xx series chipset motherboard instead of my current 785G, what kind of a performance gain would I see? This is assuming everything else is identical, including CPU/socket, PCI-E 2.0 GPU/slot, and memory. I heard that it's a good idea to use a motherboard with no integrated graphics to avoid offloading any power onto an unused video chip, or something like that, but again I'm not sure.
Specs are in my signature. Edit: It happens to be totally coincidental that both my desktop and laptop use the same chipset (I bought them at different times for different uses). Except with my laptop, I obviously have to use the onboard 4200.
If I had chosen an 8xx series chipset motherboard instead of my current 785G, what kind of a performance gain would I see? This is assuming everything else is identical, including CPU/socket, PCI-E 2.0 GPU/slot, and memory. I heard that it's a good idea to use a motherboard with no integrated graphics to avoid offloading any power onto an unused video chip, or something like that, but again I'm not sure.
Specs are in my signature. Edit: It happens to be totally coincidental that both my desktop and laptop use the same chipset (I bought them at different times for different uses). Except with my laptop, I obviously have to use the onboard 4200.
Last edited: