smackababy
Lifer
- Oct 30, 2008
- 27,024
- 79
- 86
I don't buy the whole "my group's discrimination was worse than your group's discrimination" as counting for much.
How's that supposed to work exactly, is there a point scale?
"My group's Jim Crow is worth 6-failure excuse points but your group's Chinese Exclusion Act is only worth 4-failure excuse points."
"Oh yeah? Well I'll raise you an Internment and a set of houseboys!"
"Slavery!" (Trump card played! Failure excuse for ALL TIME granted!)
Eh, according to some study, it does effect it on a point scale. At least, for SAT score adjustment and admissions.
Those were the adjustments that were noted. This was based on the old 1600 point SAT score.Blacks: +230
Hispanics: +185
Asians: -50
Recruited athletes: +200
Legacies (children of alumni): +160
Asians aren't viewed as historically having suffered mass discrimination in the US. It might be because they don't constantly bring it up as a reminder as to why they can't get ahead though.
And what happens when including GPA and other stuff gives the same or worse (in their eyes) results? Why doesn't the NAACP focus on educating minorities rather than trying to change all the rules to benefit them? How about making them better as individuals?The usual expected overreaction.
If you read details of the NAACP suit they don't want to kick Asians out just to make room for Blacks and Hispanics they want acceptance to not be based on a single test which is having a disparate impact. They want other testing criteria included along with students GPA.
Albert Einstein failed his college entrance exam and obviously a single test isn't indicative of potential.
Last edited:
