What Darwin Never Knew ...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Religion is scientific? :rolleyes: I was under the impression that Religion was based on "faith" i.e. believing in shit someone else tells you to believe in.

I didn't say that religion is scientific. Learn to read.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Very good show. I'm sure they'll replay it so set your DVRs, it's a must watch.

What was really interesting is the "switch" parts of DNA which come into play depending on environment. I didn't know that although they've mapped out the entire chain and identified all the genes the show said some 98% of DNA doesn't "do anything".
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
I was happy to discover I'm only 13 well-timed switches from being a chicken.

:eek:

or should I say, "Brawwwk --- brawk-brawk-brawkkkk." :D


The was some stuff that was pretty 'ho-hum' and other things that were quite fascinating.

The 'jaw hypothesis' on the development of the brain was very interesting.

What could have been a fun discussion in this thread .... that's become not-so-interesting D:




--
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Maybe the error in this thread is to assume the first genius to come up with a given theory then becomes to ultimate be all end all of that particular branch of science.

We could talk about a another certified genius by the name of Newton, who first really accurately described and pioneered the the understanding of the laws of Physics while inventing some new mathematics to better describe those laws. And to this day, many of the laws of Physics bear the name Newtonian physics. And only in the last century or so have new people come along in the field of relativity and quantum mechanics to extend those laws to the realm of the minute and to cosmic scales.

Yet when Newton was asked at the time, how he could see so much further than his many others who had far more flawed Physics models , Newton was quick to say he stood on the shoulders of other giants.

And now for an understanding of evolution we stand on the shoulders of giants like Darwin and Mendel. After all why should we leave out Mendel? Darwin merely proposed a mechanism of natural selection should exists, it was Mendel who described the math of how it worked.