or maybe one of those zalman reserators from back in the day, they still make those?
edit: They do have moving parts though, dont they?
Yes, the pump.
I actually don't need much cpu power. Just the basics. Web/email/word processing etc. And onboard video card is fine. I figured if i put a huge heatsink on a low powered processor I probably would be ok. Thanks for all the recommendation so far I am checking into them. Is a celeron the lowest powered processor these days? amd?
Lowest power draw? That would be "Pineview" Atom, followed by the older Atom, then CULV mobile chips (don't know if you can get those for desktop), followed by regular mobile chips (you can get mini ITX boards that use them). After that, you can get low end Core 2 Duo/Pentium Dual Core/Celeron or low end Athlon II and undervolt them.
A couple of recommendations:
#1 If this is your only system, get something faster than an Atom, and something that is dual core. The reason is that sooner or later you will run across something that will need more than a single core or an Atom. I own an Atom powered netbook and two Atom powered mini ITX boards. I've also (a while back) switched from dual core to single core for a while. It is noticeable. You don't need anything super fast, just as long as it has two cores and is a current platform, and not an Atom.
#2 I know there is a certain allure with having a "no moving parts" setup, but trust me when I say that it is 100X more difficult than to have a "barely moving parts" setup. By this, I mean that a really low RPM and undervolted fan that you positively, absolutely cannot hear from more than an arms reach away can be the difference between runs great and overheating.
For regular desktop CPUs, the best heatsinks for running "passively" (they still require some airflow) are big ones with lots of heatpipes... AND... lots of space between the fins. Likely units are the Scythe Ninja series, Cooler Master Hyper Z600, Thermaltake Sonic Tower (AFAIK not being made anymore) and Thermalright HR-01.