kjboughton
Senior member
- Dec 19, 2007
- 330
- 118
- 116
My problem is that i have QDE4 engineering sample and it is 4770K.
Post your CPUID or simply a CPU-Z screen shot if you are unsure what is being asked of you.
My problem is that i have QDE4 engineering sample and it is 4770K.
Hello i have a problem
then i try to Load v3.efi in to shell it says Wrong cpu but i have a E5 2650 v3 but is this because its an es model
Thanks for answer. I ran last night sandsifter for you. Here is the file, it is most efficient compress that I have ever done, 238 Mb > 2,3 Mb
sandsifter_instructions
Tell me if you need the log file with different settings.
Balanced Performance perhaps allows C3 at the core level (which cannot be stopped with the in-BIOS Package limit) and BSOD can result.
Nearest I can tell EDP is a hardwired (fused) limit set at time of binning must like how multipliers are set.
Post your CPUID or simply a CPU-Z screen shot if you are unsure what is being asked of you.
Could I ask you for the Taichi x99 bios which you gave to shorty1111 ?
Thank you
here you go. made one for you. removed haswell microcode: http://www.mediafire.com/file/vrvi4ruah3uovv0/mod_X99TC_1.80/file
Hello everyone,
What pair of xeons E5 v3(V4) do you recommend to get max performance after OCing (I will be using them for poker solving calculations which means it's 100% load)?
Thank you ! I'm going to deploy it now
Update:
Weird, I checked and the microcodes are not in the given bios yet ... it did not work:
https://ibb.co/iCqk3L
When I load v3.efi it says the Microcodes are present.
On second bios I have version 1.40 and the v3.efi does work there ... yet both checked bioses shows exactly the same status in MMtool for microcodes.
V4 won't work with this all core turbo mod. As for the V3 I believe the 2696v3/2699v3 will get you the highest overclock speed of about 3.9ghz on all cores. I believe I saw that that chip has 38 multipliers so you would only need to push your bclk to 102.6mhz to get 3.9ghz.
But if you have a m.2 SSD drive you could stuck under 101 Mhz BCLK, like me.
i7-5930k is bang for the buck to gaming with 2011-3 socket. It is 4,7 Ghz OC capable if you are lucky. Clock-to-clock perfermance is awsome compared to newer skylake and etc.
I won't be using it for gaming at all. Only usecase will be poker solver applications which basically means 100% load all the time. I have seen on previous pages that 18 core xeons can sustain only 3.1GHz turbo on all cores during 100% load, is that still correct or something changed? What for mobo I already own ASUS Z10PE-D16 WS.V4 won't work with this all core turbo mod. As for the V3 I believe the 2696v3/2699v3 will get you the highest overclock speed of about 3.9ghz on all cores. I believe I saw that that chip has 38 multipliers so you would only need to push your bclk to 102.6mhz to get 3.9ghz.
I am currently running 2667v3 which has 36 multipliers and I am able to get 3.8ghz overclocked with a bclk of 105.6. Which is pushing my motherboard's stability -- for this use @kjboughton's base driver without voltage offset. Else you will have stability issues. He and I are both running on the Asus z10pe-d8 ws. It's a solid motherboard.
I am currently using this for work and gaming and I do find that with 1080ti SLI, you will still have CPU bottleneck with 3440x1440 (https://github.com/freecableguy/v3x4/releases/tag/v3x4-0.10b-i306f2-rc9). I don't know if the 3.9ghz or maybe even 4ghz (if that's doable) on the 2699/2696 would help SLI for gaming. If you're looking for a gaming rig, it's probably better to get a second hand i9-9740x or 9760x. Much higher oc capability.
It really does suck that the multiplier on these xeons are locked. I wish there was some hack to unlock them. I am pretty sure they can handle the oc.
Hi foureight84, I need following bios (new NVME drivers - with version 1.40 my PC randomly freezes now with WD Black NVME drive):That's strange. Not sure what's going on there. I could try again tomorrow and give you the file. Which version do you need? Link me
I actually have 5 m.2 nvme drives. All Samsung 970 evo
Hey I am missing something with the ratio ? is not the e5 2697 v3 x36 max ?Got the hack applied on my Z10PE-D8 WS with dual E5-2697 v3s.
Sadly, I couldn't get to 3.9 GHz, but it's close.
Running the 3407 bios with microcode removed and the v3x2_80-50-50_39_vcc1.8.efi driver MOF posted a while back.
I left the latest microcode update from Intel in place. It seems to boost to 3.8 in most situations.
Hey I am missing something with the ratio ? is not the e5 2697 v3 x36 max ?
This result is amazing. I was considering buying these two chips: https://www.ebay.es/itm/Intel-Xeon-...=item2604adc264:g:FzIAAOSwDYxbsOFO:rk:14:pf:0 and possibly OC them to 3.6GHz. Are these QS chips a good idea? I was looking for 18 core xeon, but non-ES chips are still quite expensive.Got the hack applied on my Z10PE-D8 WS with dual E5-2697 v3s.
Sadly, I couldn't get to 3.9 GHz, but it's close.
Running the 3407 bios with microcode removed and the v3x2_80-50-50_39_vcc1.8.efi driver MOF posted a while back.
I left the latest microcode update from Intel in place. It seems to boost to 3.8 in most situations.
I left the latest microcode update from Intel in place. It seems to boost to 3.8 in most situations.
I had for e5 2697 v3[QS] :What is the max turbo for all cores that someone managed to achieve using E5-2698 v3 or E5-2697 v3?