• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What cat should stay inside?

JASTECH

Senior member
I have a 1331.5 kbps speed test connection. I have 3 computers I want to connect via cat. Which cat should I use, cat5, cat5e or cat6? My router is a Netgear MR-314 and I am thinking of getting the D-Link 655 to replace it with. What do you think? Thanks, JAS

Also, what about "Jumbo Frames" settings? Or anything else in there I can change to help speed things up?
 
Originally posted by: JASTECH
Which cat should I use, cat5, cat5e or cat6? My router is a Netgear MR-314 and I am thinking of getting the D-Link 655 to replace it with. What do you think? Thanks, JAS

Also, what about "Jumbo Frames" settings? Or anything else in there I can change to help speed things up?

As to general performance improvement, there's Internet, wireless, and gigabit. They're three different spaces, each with their own issues. Perhaps if you gave more details on what your setup would be and esp. more details on the area that you'd like sped up, more specific help could be given.

The DIR-655 is a good choice, but it doesn't support jumbo frames, like most routers. However, IMO jumbo frames are generally over-hyped, and most people do just fine to forget about them.

OTOH, I understand wanting to have that capability assuming your NICs support it. You can get that using an add-on gigabit switch. Most current ones, including the D-Link DGS-220x, support 9K jumbo frames.

Small Net Builder's got some decent stuff these days. They have a detailed review on the DIR-655, and also a detailed article on jumbo frames. Where they miss out IMO on the jumbo frames article is getting past the hype and showing actual performance differences with / without jumbo frames with decent modern hardware. In their defense, you can see such differences when you use consumer NAS boxes -- and they've got lots of consumer NAS box benchmarks to back that up -- but once you get beyond low power hardware as included with such devices, gigabit speed doesn't become so difficult for the hardware itself to support, and the benefits aren't always so great. To do a full analysis on this part is difficult though, because reality, unlike theory, is very complicated and doesn't like to be greatly simplified. You can get great performance without jumbo frames, but jumbo frames can also help improve performance in some cases.
 
I was told by my ISP that cat6 isn't compatible? I thought the cabled would plug right in? This is an existing system so I will be using patch cables. My montherboard has 2 LAN's that can be "teamed" to dbl the band width.
 
So do you think the D-Link 655 and cat5e cable would be the best setup? I plan on gaming too! Like a kid, lol

I think the only thing I can speed up is up to the conversion box they have before the crossover cable to the router. Both PC's in here have gigabit chips. I am using old cat5 cable now, it gets stepped on and rolled over by desk chair too, lol. I will get longer cables to go around the room instead of across it. Thanks, JAS
 
I don't know why the vendor would say that cat 6 is incompatible (when cat 5e is OK) because cat 6 is backwards compatible with cat 5e. Well, it's probably not worth arguing about, because you're talking about patch cables, where cat 5e should be just fine. The DIR-655 should be nice.
 
Mr Madwand1, thanks for the advise. I was thinking of that but I am not an expert on the networking stuff yet, lol I am still learning and have allot to learn again and will be asking this board. Thanks, JAS
 
Back
Top