What card is closest performance-wise to an old X1950GT/Pro?

[VirtualLarry]

Just curious. Would a 4550 be comparable? 4670?

Edit: Found http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/...uality/3DMark06-v1.1.0-3DMark-Score,1829.html
According to that, X1950 XT CF is a little faster than a 4670.

So this is a 1950GT, which is slower than a Pro, which is slower than an XT. And that's CF, I only have one card.

So an X1950GT is less than half as fast as a 4670.

So what's the cheapest 4670 out there?

Huh. This http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/...8-q1/3DMark06-v1.0.2-HDR-SM3.0-Score,538.html shows the X1950GT to be a little faster than an 8600GT.

Newegg no longer has 8600GTs, but Google shopping shows them available for $40.
http://www.google.com/products/cata...og_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDUQ8wIwAg#

 

[Keysplayr]

8600GT Maybe? 2600XT? ~ish
Perhaps 48 shader 9600GSO 192-bit?

 

[Qbah]

A HD4550 would most definitely be inferior to a X1950GT. It's just a higher clocked HD4350 (same 80 shaders).

My bet would be a HD5570, maybe even a GT220 as similar to a X1950GT.

 

[Face2Face]

Nvidia 9500 GT

 

[VirtualLarry]

Thanks for the responses!

It was a good card to be sure. I didn't actually even game on it. Just desktop usage. Too bad it didn't have UVD/UVD2. Kind of useless today.

A buddy is going to put it on ebay for me.

 

[Termie]

I had both an x1900xt and a 4670. They are very comparable (and both just behind a 3850). The x1950gt would be quite a bit slower than a 4670, and thus slower than a 5570, which is similar to a 4670. I'm guessing it would provide 4650-level performance. Not sure about the nVidia side - whatever's equivalent to a 4650.

 

[cusideabelincoln]

^9500GT, GT220 are the closest (readily available) things to a 4650 and 5550.

 

[bryanW1995]

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-radeon-hd-6870-geforce-gtx-570,2834-7.html

4650 or 8600gts