The one thing people always say is that Linux is more stable/secure than WinNT. I can believe this because flaws in code are visible to anyone and can be reported and corrected quickly. The thing that gets me, is when people say they can do more with Linux than you can with Windows, and because of this, makes it a viable desktop OS.
To be a viable desktop OS (for the concumer market - which is where Linux is supposedly trying to move into), it has to be relatively easy to use. I've recently had the opportunity to install RedHat 7.2 and it was pretty easy to get up and running. I still however, could do nothing fancy with the OS that I couldn't do in Win2k (I'm not very 1337 with Linux yet)
Someone please tell me what makes this OS more productive then Windows.
To be a viable desktop OS (for the concumer market - which is where Linux is supposedly trying to move into), it has to be relatively easy to use. I've recently had the opportunity to install RedHat 7.2 and it was pretty easy to get up and running. I still however, could do nothing fancy with the OS that I couldn't do in Win2k (I'm not very 1337 with Linux yet)
Someone please tell me what makes this OS more productive then Windows.