Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: LordSnailz
I think the things you list above are mainly true but Intel's problem is, is that it's only true for the cpu market. They need to expand to different businesses and leverage what they do best, fabricate. They should want their name on anything that has to do with silicon, anything on silicon Intel should make it. I know one of their big things right now is the flash market, I don't have the exact numbers, but they're way behind in the flash market share and they're also losing partnerships (nokia) due to bad marketing strategy(intel rose the price on their flash memory last year and lost nokia's contract to samsung).
So, no they're not doing that many things wrong in the cpu areana, but Intel as a whole, there is a lot of room for improvement. Also, are you sure about the great benefits package, I remember that they're not known for well paid salaries ...
I think that the belief is that Americans generally can't compete with with Japanese, Taiwanese, etc. in fabrication. We've generally had lower results than them. This is actually one of the reasons why Intel is in microprocessors nowadays. Before they were mainly in memory, but the cut-throat nature & high-spending/low-profit of DRAM and such made Intel and most other American companies drop out and focus on things that require more innovation, like microprocessors.
Some people think that Intel's third act is communications/wireless communications work. First act = memory, Second Act = Microprocessors, Third Act = communication related?