• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

what battle had the most american casualties?

Um, he's asking about one BATTLE, not a whole war.

On an unrelated note, isn't it amazing that the crew of the Enola Gay probably killed more people with one direct action than anyone else in history?? I wonder how they deal with it.
 
they probley deal with it by knowing that if they didn't drop the bomb the casualities that would have resulted from an invasion would have been very high
 
Originally posted by: Mermaidman
Um, he's asking about one BATTLE, not a whole war.

On an unrelated note, isn't it amazing that the crew of the Enola Gay probably killed more people with one direct action than anyone else in history?? I wonder how they deal with it.

They are an instrument of war, the politicians made the decision. The crew probably didn't even know the power of the atom bomb.
 
Originally posted by: spc hink
they probley deal with it by knowing that if they didn't drop the bomb the casualities that would have resulted from an invasion would have been very high

Lets not start that topic. IMHO and knowledge, Japan was really really close to surrendering but that's another story.
 
Originally posted by: sonz70
What about a battle of the Pacific in WW2?

Hmmm...that starts to get hazy because those sieges lasted so long. For example, the battle of Okinawa produced 72,000 American casualties but lasted nearly three months to Gettysburg's three days.

But if we're switching the discussion to single day battles, no single day of Gettysburg was as bloody as the Battle of Sharpsburg (or Antietem depending on who you ask 😉) which produced 23,000 casualties
 
Back
Top