That’s some extremely intellectually lazy thinking right there. For one, the difference in the two parties in terms of being part of the problem or being the solution couldn’t be any larger. I mean one party actually tried to reign in corporations, fraud, and enact protections for consumers while the other party has done the opposite.
Second, lobbying, pork barrel spending, and pet projects have been apart of the political system EXCEPT very recently (2010/2011) and only has recently been reinstated (or the ban lifted). So that little experiment obviously failed as almost nothing got done between those years.
But go ahead, keep voting for a third party and wonder why things keep getting worse.
I didn't say that one party isn't better than the other, though if you looked at my voting record, you'd see that I am a single-party voter because I agree with the platform more for one party than the other.
What I said is that neither are the solution. Because the problem isn't one party or the other, but more the sequential and widespread individual actions which have put cronyism and self-enrichment above the good of the country, and unfortunately because of the massive cost of running a presidential campaign, there are going to be demands made on any presidential candidate with the system we currently have, along with most Congresspeople. That's the problem, and I wouldn't be stupid enough to vote third-party. I'm also not so stupid to think that either Republicans or Democrats are the answer to fixing this.
As for the earmarks you're referring to, Boehner banned earmarks in 2011, but that ban was no longer in effect as of January 2019. Have you considered that nothing happened from 2011-now because from Jan 2011-Jan 2017 we had a House and Senate who refused to do anything because they were enraged that a black man was President? And that they couldn't get anything done from Jan 2017-Jan 2019 because they couldn't get their own heads out of their asses? And that they couldn't get anything done from Jan 2019 til now because the Senate refuses to hear any House legislation?
The problem is that all of this stalemate is hurting Americans, and not affecting (but may be potentially helping), those in positions of political power. Again, it's cronyism and self-interest. If the Senate doesn't vote against Democratic legislation that is widely viewed as positive by even some Republicans, then Democrats can't use those votes in campaigns against the incumbent Republicans!