People still believe that riots and demonstrations accomplish something?
It's no different than running 5 or 10 miles for <insert cause>
Wishful thinking.
Turn around, bend over and walk backwards is about as much as you can do.
![]()
Seems to me it is a tactic that is utilized around the world to varying degrees of effectiveness. What would be a smarter, non-violent way to fan the winds of change?
Races raise money. You pay to run those races.
Running 5 or 10 miles for an organized event (cause) typically cost $20-$50+ per runner around here.
assassination is very effective if done frequently and relatively non-violent if done properly
What do you actually accomplish by "running" or doing any other activity.
Just give them 20-50 bucks and call it a day.
All of that effort can be put into SO MANY useful things....vs "running".
Why not make up some other useless activity, like....banging your head against the window. Or jumping jacks etc.
fatty alert
Going to school and getting a degree. Staying with the mothers of their children and raising them correctly. Getting a job and caring about keeping it. Avoiding criminal activity. Slowly building a reputation for being productive, law abiding citizens. Voting.
If all that had been started 10 years ago, Michael Brown would likely not have been walking the streets looking for trouble in the first place. That's change that works. It's too late for him, but they could have begun that change yesterday by not rioting. Too late for that as well now. So start today then. Maybe 10 years from now the next Michael Brown will be at home studying instead of walking the streets of his home town looking for cigarillos to steal.
What do you actually accomplish by "running" or doing any other activity.
Just give them 20-50 bucks and call it a day.
All of that effort can be put into SO MANY useful things....vs "running".
Why not make up some other useless activity, like....banging your head against the window. Or jumping jacks etc.
I will take you up on it.
How about eating 100s cheeseburgers for <insert cause>.
How is that any different than running 10 miles. Neither activity accomplishes much for the cause.
What would be a smarter, non-violent way to fan the winds of change?
What would be helpful? Have their mouthpieces put forward a factual argument that clearly supports their contentions. Not "some poor child was shot" who was a huge and dangerous individual who attacked people because he could. If they cannot then the fault lies in their perceptions and they have to deal with that. If they riot they should not have excuses made for them or "well back in 1920". No, they are accountable for their actions and should receive what they would dole out.
If an argument can be made in their favor then do what was done in the '60s by MLK. Peaceful civil disobedience which worked very well.
The problem is that we have become lesser sons of greater sires and seem incapable of rational objections to genuine wrongs; indeed we no longer recognize right from wrong but instead see whatever means to get what we want as being "the greater good".
I will take you up on it.
How about eating 100s cheeseburgers for <insert cause>.
How is that any different than running 10 miles. Neither activity accomplishes much for the cause.
Yeah, that's all good advice, but in the end, you know, he still didn't have a goddamn gun. And according to the prosecutor for St. Louis county ten of Wilson's shots were fired from 125 yards away. That Brown must have been one scary guy.