- Dec 28, 2000
- 1,892
- 1
- 71
Last edited by a moderator:
You forgot to add your commentary for your link. Let me do it for you.
Chomsky says: The United States is evil, Israel is evil. The United Nations is good, the U.N. charter is good, Iran is good. We should sanction the evil Israel, we should all hate the evil United States, we should all send money to the United Nations. Thank you.
A bit simplified, but I hit all the major points. Next time include your commentary in your threads.
You forgot to add your commentary for your link. Let me do it for you.
Chomsky says: The United States is evil, Israel is evil. The United Nations is good, the U.N. charter is good, Iran is good. We should sanction the evil Israel, we should all hate the evil United States, we should all send money to the United Nations. Thank you.
A bit simplified, but I hit all the major points. Next time include your commentary in your threads.
we should all send money to the United Nations. Thank you.
.
Really?
Did you have your dog read it to you or something?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chomsky hasn't thought through consequences. He merely rehashes old arguments. While I accept that for the moment the primary goal would be defensive, as in thwarting invasion, it's hard to imagine anyone mounting a land assault. That leaves me wondering what they might do which requires protection. The part about nuclear weapons being defensive does not mean either passive or local. All nations which have developed nuclear weapons follow up with a delivery system to expand their sphere of influence and retaliatory capability. That makes perfect sense because it's better to use such devastating weapons on your opponents land.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok Gintaras, color me totally confused, I can maybe understand you are not a happy camper about the comments of Norm Chomsky, but it seems to me you have no right to to drag a moderator like Fern into your opinions?
Could you please explain this anomaly?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In my opinion, Vintage Haybausa self delusions of grander, as Haybasusa asserts without offering an iota of proof that only he has thought of all consequences and Chomsky has not.
It still boils down to the UN doctrine that any nation has the right to exploit nuclear energy for peace time electrical generation of nuclear power.
As I can only say, Haybabsusa, you are not my guru as I find your analysis shallow, biased, and superficial. You certainly have a right to your opinions, on this forum, but, self declaring your self always right in advance lacks any impressive logic.
You are not my pupil. They have a far better track record than yourself.
You forgot to add your commentary for your link. Let me do it for you.
Chomsky says: The United States is evil, Israel is evil. The United Nations is good, the U.N. charter is good, Iran is good. We should sanction the evil Israel, we should all hate the evil United States, we should all send money to the United Nations. Thank you.
A bit simplified, but I hit all the major points. Next time include your commentary in your threads.
LL has aptly demonstrated no viable track record in this regard.
Statements are made by him but when called on it, he can not back them up.
Thats exactly what I thought about you when I read your statement!!Noam Chomsky does a good job summing it up as usual. I can't believe so many people are stupid enough to fall for the lies manufactured by the American state.
Actually if we go by that statement of your alone. Hayabusa Rider is not only your Guru but your Master!!! That is based on your analysis which is flawed as usual!!As I can only say, Haybabsusa, you are not my guru as I find your analysis shallow, biased, and superficial. You certainly have a right to your opinions, on this forum, but, self declaring your self always right in advance lacks any impressive logic.
Noam Chomsky was correct when he compared the U.S. policies to those of the Mafia, Al Jazeera quoted Mr. bin Laden as saying.
I bet ole Noam cried when he lost that supporter.
http://articles.businessinsider.com...lobal-warming-dollar-greenhouse-gas-emissions
I'm pretty sure that a lot more people than Bin Laden would agree with that statement. It's kinda like saying that the sky is blue...
Yep!! Even God needs to comment when opening a thread!! Especially about Norm Chumpsky!!!I didn't know that I do need to add a comment.
Everyone can get "NEWS" from reading a newspaper or watching a TV.
"News" are no different from any other job in the World - someone does his/her job while getting paid and does - what his/her boss has ordered him/her to do.
Today, in The World are 4 major News Corporations that deliver "news" to the masses the way they - News Corp.s want to.
Noam Chomsky? He's not being paid from major News Corp.s and does not deliver "news" to the masses.
I'd rather would say, Noam Chomsky does ANALYSIS of the news without taking sides.
And, Noam Chomsky, prolly, most intellectual human living on the Planet today.
If you say so. I'm sure you were happy to agree with Osama Bin Laden on some of his other opinions also. It's who you are.
Noam Chomsky does a good job summing it up as usual. I can't believe so many people are stupid enough to fall for the lies manufactured by the American state.