What Android phone app allows you to save to SD (and control pic resolution?)

[Artdeco]

Never mind, not worth the effort, as I've been reminded, being stupid isn't a criteria for banning a member here.

 

[shabby]

Never mind, not worth the effort, as I've been reminded, being stupid isn't a criteria for banning a member here.

Says who? Just click on this little thing

and we'll find out.

 

[Artdeco]

Says who? Just click on this little thing

and we'll find out.

I dunno, I'm so stupid, I crop my photos

 

[monkey333]

I dunno, I'm so stupid, I crop my photos

Nah, according to the OP you just need photography lessons.

Even if you say, have a nice dlsr and forget your zoom and decide to crop, you're doing photos wrong. Every photo perfect, every time.

 

[GoodEnough]

Never mind, not worth the effort, as I've been reminded, being stupid isn't a criteria for banning a member here.

Ad hominem logic fail. Try refuting anything I've said.
You can't just call someone stupid and claim victory in the argument.

Moot point. I'm done with this debate.
I've arrived at my solution to take 2MP photos.

Good luck with printing billboards or cropping out one person from a stadium or whatever the F you do with your pics.

 

[monkey333]

Ad hominem logic fail. Try refuting anything I've said.
You can't just call someone stupid and claim victory in the argument.

Moot point. I'm done with this debate.
I've arrived at my solution to take 2MP photos.

Good luck with printing billboards or cropping out one person from a stadium or whatever the F you do with your pics.

Not 1 solution works for everyone and for you to suggest anyone who crops is a shitty photographer is ridiculous. The point is these cameras ALLOW us to make decisions that work in different situations. Ironic that you try to come off as some 'baller' with the items in your signature when your screen name and seeming attitude is good enough. Why have anything that exceeds ones needs? Just achieve the bare minimum.
I genuinely regret helping you out, you are lazy and rely on others opinions and if they seem in any way to contradict your thoughts, you troll.

 

[shabby]

I've arrived at my solution to take 2MP photos.

Don't leave us hanging bro, share the solution!

 

[stlc8tr]

I don't think people here even understand what troll means. I will try one last time. A 22MP photo DOES NOT FIT onto any screen you own. When you view your photo, it will be sized down to 2MP or less. You physically CAN NOT view 22MP even if you wanted to. My 26" LCD monitor can only display 2MP. All other devices are even smaller. Any online sharing of a photo will rescale your 22MP photo into a small fraction of that. Facebook does not allow anything larger than 4MP. Twitter's maximum size is .14MP

If this is still too complicated, maybe this will help:
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/resize-photos-online-sharing,news-19195.html

You must have a pretty crappy monitor.

Even 1600p is 4MP.

Newer 5K monitors are 14MP.

 

[monkey333]

Don't leave us hanging bro, share the solution!

I'm shocked it's not in his signature.

 

[WelshBloke]

We can agree that no one is viewing anything larger than 2MP

Nope.

 

[sweenish]

Ad hominem logic fail. Try refuting anything I've said.
You can't just call someone stupid and claim victory in the argument.

Moot point. I'm done with this debate.
I've arrived at my solution to take 2MP photos.

Good luck with printing billboards or cropping out one person from a stadium or whatever the F you do with your pics.

This is a massive hypocritical fail, as almost all you've done is argue with strawmen and ad hominems. Not very surprised though.

Still no A|B test upload. Probably realized how wrong you were.

 

[GoodEnough]

Still no A|B test upload. Probably realized how wrong you were.

Do you understand that you can not do an A/B test?
That was the point of the statement, to see if anyone had a clue about megapixels beyond "MORE IS BETTER" MORE MORE MORE!!
One pic will be 50x the size of your screen.
It will need to be downsampled just to see it, at which point the comparison is moot.

 

[GoodEnough]

You must have a pretty crappy monitor.

Even 1600p is 4MP.

Newer 5K monitors are 14MP.

Check the sig.
1920x1080.
Overkill for my needs.

 

[shabby]

Check the sig.

Scanner: Epson Perfection V300
4800 x 9600 dpi optical resolution for extraordinary enlargements from film

Hue hue hue...

 

[stlc8tr]

Check the sig.
1920x1080.
Overkill for my needs.

Like I said, a pretty crappy monitor.

I guess if I was stuck with ancient equipment, I'd be happy with 2MP too.

 

[nOOky]

In his defense, if he asks this many questions in other sub-forums, he may have gotten tired of listing what his PC's specs are and they are there for that purpose. They also signify that he is an enthusiast.

(I used to be proud of mine, but now my crap is old and out of date and I don't really care anymore )

just gonna post this

1) no one give a shit about your PC specs in your sig
2) we already told you how to do this in your last thread

 

[sweenish]

Not an enthusiast, doesn't know enough.