- Feb 8, 2001
- 4,822
- 0
- 0
As the AGW research malfeasance focus continues on the University of East Anglia, it seems as though the problem is more wide spread. The following articles identify significant problems with the research and analysis done in New Zealand, previously considered a place where the temperature measurement indicated serious impact from human factors.
P.S. I would suggest all climatologists everywhere now consider moving their sophisticated temperature gauges away from air conditioning ducts and areas subject to local effects, ie airport runways and parking lots for large buses. Also, don't you think that if the temperature has been measured in one spot for a hundred years, but that spot went from being a sheeps pasture to being a white concrete building with the gauge placed on the roof for convenience that you might now be able to account for the 50% rise in your readings? I certainly would consider it man made warming, but we could just knock down the building if it is that important, and not spend trillions of dollars.
P.P.S. Duh!
*********************************************
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/j...-spreads-the-plot-thickens-the-shame-deepens/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/...erent-story-than-the-official-one/#more-13215
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/06/how-not-to-measure-temperature-part-92-surrounded-by-science/
http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the...-station-an-international-laughing-stock.html
There's already a number of thread dealing with the climate and this summit, no need to start another.
Red Dawn
Anandtech Admin
P.S. I would suggest all climatologists everywhere now consider moving their sophisticated temperature gauges away from air conditioning ducts and areas subject to local effects, ie airport runways and parking lots for large buses. Also, don't you think that if the temperature has been measured in one spot for a hundred years, but that spot went from being a sheeps pasture to being a white concrete building with the gauge placed on the roof for convenience that you might now be able to account for the 50% rise in your readings? I certainly would consider it man made warming, but we could just knock down the building if it is that important, and not spend trillions of dollars.
P.P.S. Duh!
*********************************************
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/j...-spreads-the-plot-thickens-the-shame-deepens/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/...erent-story-than-the-official-one/#more-13215
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/06/how-not-to-measure-temperature-part-92-surrounded-by-science/
http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the...-station-an-international-laughing-stock.html
There's already a number of thread dealing with the climate and this summit, no need to start another.
Red Dawn
Anandtech Admin
Last edited by a moderator: